2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals using geochemical normalization factors in the aquatic sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
21
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
6
21
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two samples of soil exhibited moderate risk in the studied area based on the PERI classification (S6 and S8), while, in the case of sediment, the average value of PERI showed a moderate potential ecological risk (Sed6-very high ecological potential risk; Sed21 and Sed23-considerable ecological potential risk; Sed8 and Sed22-moderate ecological potential risk). These results suggest that the enrichment of Cd and As in the studied sediments had an important contribution to the high values of PERI, the mean value being much higher than the value reported by Arisekar et al [75] in the Thamirabarani River basin, India.…”
Section: Pollution Characteristicscontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…Two samples of soil exhibited moderate risk in the studied area based on the PERI classification (S6 and S8), while, in the case of sediment, the average value of PERI showed a moderate potential ecological risk (Sed6-very high ecological potential risk; Sed21 and Sed23-considerable ecological potential risk; Sed8 and Sed22-moderate ecological potential risk). These results suggest that the enrichment of Cd and As in the studied sediments had an important contribution to the high values of PERI, the mean value being much higher than the value reported by Arisekar et al [75] in the Thamirabarani River basin, India.…”
Section: Pollution Characteristicscontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…The findings of Nasrabadi et al (2010), Giri et al (2013), Li et al (2014), Wu et al (2017), andArisekar et al (2022) on the small-scale rivers indicate the impact of anthropogenic agents on the heavy metal abundance in Xiaoyang, Thamirabarani, Subarnarekha, Lianshan, Wuli, and Cishan river sediments. Wu et al (2017) showed that anthropogenic input is associated with urban development, especially industrial intensification.…”
Section: Pollution Assessment In Small Riversmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Giri et al (2013) confirmed that the increased concentration of metals in the Subarnarekha River is due to the direct discharge of industrial, urban, and mining wastes into the river. However, Arisekar et al (2022) highlighted that the high level of pollution was influenced by agricultural runoff. According to this study, the Moyang and Jian rivers are moderately to very highly contaminated with Pb, Ni, Cd, and Cu metals when the CF, EF, mCd, PI, MPI, RI, and MRI values are taken into consideration.…”
Section: Pollution Assessment In Small Riversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Igeo is a method to assess metal pollution and accumulation in sediments by eliminating the in uence of geological factors, which has been widely used in the assessment of metal pollution in river sediments (Arisekar et al, 2022). The calculation method is as follows:…”
Section: Geo-accumulation Index (Igeo)mentioning
confidence: 99%