2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.12.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution and fate of environmentally sensitive elements (arsenic, mercury, stibium and selenium) in coal-fired power plants at Huainan, Anhui, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For emission of vapor TEs, the emission that resulted from operation of ESP only (runs 1 and 3 in Table 11 and Table 12) showed lower Hg and Cl compared to when FGD was applied regardless of coal type, but no distinct trend was observed for F. This is contrary to the findings that wet FGD could reduce the emission of volatile TEs as reported in the literature (Córdoba, Ochoa-Gonzalez, et al, 2012;Meij and te Winkel, 2007;Swanson et al, 2013;Tang et al, 2012). The reduction could be achieved because FGD resulted in the cooling of flue gas, allowing the more volatile TEs to condense from the vapor phase (Swaine and Goodarzi, 1995).…”
Section: Tes Behavior In Flue Gascontrasting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For emission of vapor TEs, the emission that resulted from operation of ESP only (runs 1 and 3 in Table 11 and Table 12) showed lower Hg and Cl compared to when FGD was applied regardless of coal type, but no distinct trend was observed for F. This is contrary to the findings that wet FGD could reduce the emission of volatile TEs as reported in the literature (Córdoba, Ochoa-Gonzalez, et al, 2012;Meij and te Winkel, 2007;Swanson et al, 2013;Tang et al, 2012). The reduction could be achieved because FGD resulted in the cooling of flue gas, allowing the more volatile TEs to condense from the vapor phase (Swaine and Goodarzi, 1995).…”
Section: Tes Behavior In Flue Gascontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Based on the RE definition that includes ash content in coal, it is speculated that such finding could be due to low ash content (2.3%) in subbituminous coal. Other studies reported higher ash content in coal of 11% in the Netherlands (Meij, 1995), 32.51-36.25% in India (Reddy et al, 2005), 28.7-54.25% in Brazil (Depoi et al, 2008), 15.3-33.2% in Canada (Goodarzi, 2009 and 26.31-30.5% in China (Tang et al, 2012). Ash content influences coal combustion in several aspects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The metal concentrations in the coal mine soil are lower than those from the power plant, which indicates a higher release ratio of metals from the power plant. Tang et al (2012) reported that approximately 0.3 Mt yr À1 of arsenic were released into atmosphere during coal combustion in the Huainan power plant. The concentrations of metal generally increased with the length of the mining duration, except for Cd and Zn.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When selenate or selenite coexist with other anions such as nitrate (NO 3 − ), sulfate (SO 4 2− ), and perchlorate (ClO 4 − ), biological Se reduction can be inhibited by the electron scavenging of denitrifying bacteria, sulfate-reducing bacteria, or perchlorate-reducing bacteria because most selenate-reducing bacteria are heterotrophic facultative anaerobes which compete for electron donors under anoxic or anaerobic conditions. Another limiting factor might be the drastic change of selenate in the water body due to irrigated agricultural drainage [11], sedimentary soil erosion [3], surface mining [12], coal-fired power plants [13], and so on. Most biological selenate reductions are targeted for either pure culture or up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket process [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%