2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1466-822x.2001.00246.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution and habitat use of water frog hybrid complexes in France

Abstract: Hybrid zones are either distributed along clines or in a mosaic of patches. This distribution may depend upon variation in taxon habitat use. Habitat use and distribution of diverse taxa of water frogs (Rana ridibunda, R. lessonae, R. perezi, R. kl. grafi and R. kl. esculenta) in France are analysed to determine whether water frog complexes conform to the mosaic or clinal model. Biogeographical scenarios may be invoked in order to explain the distribution of water frogs. However, the distribution of R. perezi … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For R. perezi, incorporation of foreign alleles counteracts the loss of genetic variability due to founder effects, as can be seen at the high levels of heterozygosity in Camarguean populations. Owing to the high competitiveness of R. ridibunda in freshwater habitats (Pagano et al 2001), the ecological niche of R. perezi in the Camargue seems to Table 1. Location of sites and population composition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For R. perezi, incorporation of foreign alleles counteracts the loss of genetic variability due to founder effects, as can be seen at the high levels of heterozygosity in Camarguean populations. Owing to the high competitiveness of R. ridibunda in freshwater habitats (Pagano et al 2001), the ecological niche of R. perezi in the Camargue seems to Table 1. Location of sites and population composition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We defined eight clusters involving all our reference samples. Species of other taxa might have been sampled by accident, as R. esculenta and R. lessonae frequently occur in habitats in the mid-Rhô ne floodplains (Pagano et al 2001). Further, we know little of the exact distribution range of R. bergeri, R. hispanica and R. saharica.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plots y ϭ Ϫ1.38x ϩ 20.79 (R 2 ϭ 0.68); y ϭ Ϫ0.05x ϩ 6.78 (R 2 ϭ 0.88); and y ϭ Ϫ0.06x ϩ 7.65 (R 2 ϭ 0.41) represent the best fits to the ice accumulation rate vs. the body mass in R. lessonae, R. ridibunda, and R. esculenta, respectively. the region where the frogs were caught, mixed assemblages of R. esculenta and R. lessonae occupy shallow eutrophicated ponds, whereas R. ridibunda is mainly found in rivers and lakes (32). As a correlate, these taxa are also considered as differing in their wintering habits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maintenance of the complex supposes something like a "sexual parasitism" by hybrid females that preferentially mate with parental lessonae males, thus restoring hybridity (21). Within this assemblage, the habitat preference of each species has been well studied (23,30,32). R. ridibunda preferentially inhabits well-oxygenated waters (often lakes, rivers, and dead arms near rivers), whereas the two other species are found in shallow ponds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these three species are very close relatives, they strongly differ in their habitat use. For instance, the marsh frog exhibits a clear preference for habitats influenced by rivers (dead arms and gravel-pits) whereas R. lessonae and R. esculenta are rare or absent from these habitats (Pagano et al, 2001). Furthermore, whilst R. ridibunda overwinters under water, R. esculenta, and R. lessonae hibernate in woodland 3-7 cm below the surface of the soil, under moss, fallen leaves and small branches (Berger '82;Holenweg and Reyer, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%