2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00333-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution and mobility of metals in contaminated sites. Chemometric investigation of pollutant profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
62
1
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
62
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine the chemical species of heavy metals in soil, a large number of single and multiple sequential extraction procedures, which use a series of reagents to separate the soil metals into different fractions, have been developed (Tessier et al 1979;Shuman 1985;Rauret 1998;Leleyter and Probst 1999). Although the sequential extraction methods suffer from non-selectivity and trace element redistribution among phases during extraction, they are still suggested for evaluating the mobility and potentially bioavailable metal fractions in contaminated soils (Gómez Ariza et al 2000;Kabala and Singh 2001;Abollino et al 2002;Parat et al 2003;Pueyo et al 2003;Banat et al 2005;Hu et al 2006). In some research work, consistent correlations between specific metal fractions and plant metal contents were found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the chemical species of heavy metals in soil, a large number of single and multiple sequential extraction procedures, which use a series of reagents to separate the soil metals into different fractions, have been developed (Tessier et al 1979;Shuman 1985;Rauret 1998;Leleyter and Probst 1999). Although the sequential extraction methods suffer from non-selectivity and trace element redistribution among phases during extraction, they are still suggested for evaluating the mobility and potentially bioavailable metal fractions in contaminated soils (Gómez Ariza et al 2000;Kabala and Singh 2001;Abollino et al 2002;Parat et al 2003;Pueyo et al 2003;Banat et al 2005;Hu et al 2006). In some research work, consistent correlations between specific metal fractions and plant metal contents were found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice between the two indexes of similarities is not straightforward; in several cases, distance and correlation coefficient are used to classify samples and variables respectively [10], but this rule is not always followed. Most of the papers cited in section 2.1.2 started from Euclidean distances [11][12][13][14] or squared Euclidean distances [15][16][17][18] for clustering samples and/or variables. Some studies adopted correlations as similarity measurements for the classification of variables [10,19,20] or, less commonly, samples [21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the papers cited in section 2.1.2 used Ward's method of agglomeration [11,[13][14][15][16][17][18]22]. Other studies applied complete linkage [12,19,21] or average linkage [10,23] clustering.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fate of airborne metals in soils and their distribution in the soil profile are conditioned by soil properties and usually reflect the course of soil formation (Abollino et al 2002a;Kabata-Pendias 2011;Alloway 2013;Wang and Xu 2015). The latter are usually particularly well recorded in Podzols.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%