2005
DOI: 10.1016/s1349-0079(05)80012-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution and Morphological Features of Taste Buds in the Zebrafish, Danio rerio

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since they increase the surface available for receptors, barbels are supposed to have an adaptive function, notably for species that do not favour the sense of vision when foraging on the ground (Gilbert & Bailey, 1972; Gosline, 1978; Banarescu & Coad, 1991; Sibbing, 1991; Lombarte & Aguirre, 1997). However, rather than barbels, taste buds, which are chemosensory endorgans distributed on external skin and in the oral cavity–but at highest densities on barbels—are the main constituent for chemical stimulus reception (Ohkubo et al ., 2005). As such, chemo‐reception can be effective with or without the presence of barbels on the facial taste system (Lammens & Hoogenboezem, 1991; Eram & Michel, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since they increase the surface available for receptors, barbels are supposed to have an adaptive function, notably for species that do not favour the sense of vision when foraging on the ground (Gilbert & Bailey, 1972; Gosline, 1978; Banarescu & Coad, 1991; Sibbing, 1991; Lombarte & Aguirre, 1997). However, rather than barbels, taste buds, which are chemosensory endorgans distributed on external skin and in the oral cavity–but at highest densities on barbels—are the main constituent for chemical stimulus reception (Ohkubo et al ., 2005). As such, chemo‐reception can be effective with or without the presence of barbels on the facial taste system (Lammens & Hoogenboezem, 1991; Eram & Michel, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The teleost TBs are found throughout the body epithelium, especially in the oral and oropharyngeal cavity, the head, or in external organs such as the lips, barbels or fins (Hansen et al,2002). Barbels containing TBs are reported in Mullidae (Aguirre and Lombarte,2000), Cyprinidae (Ohkubo et al,2005), Siluridae (Ovalle and Shinn,1977; Fujimoto and Yamamoto,1980), Gadidae (Harvey and Batty,2002) and Cottidae (Sato,1977). Chemosensory cells are found in the fish epidermis showing a single microvillus apex, or even brush‐like microvilli (Kotrschal,1991,1996; Hansen et al,2002; LeClair and Topczewski,2010), in contact with the aquatic environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food or other types of particles may deflect in the taste buds and synergistically produce mechanical impulse or chemosensory signal which could be transmitted from the sensory cells to the brain centers (Reutter et al, ; Reutter & Breipohl, ; review Kasumyan, ). That is why it was suggested that rich occurrences of taste buds increase the probability of detecting and locating accuracy in areas of limited light penetration (Viña et al, ) and such adaptation can be assigned to the characteristics feature of animals that dwell in turbid waters (Ohkubo et al, ). In case of hilsa, the taste buds are intraoral and diverse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of hilsa, the taste buds are intraoral and diverse. Ohkubo et al () reported that such fish with rich diversity of taste buds are specialized for the detection of chemical stimuli in an opaque environment. Tripathi and Mittal () also reported in a bottom dwelling fish Noemacheilus botia , which lives in turbid and aphotic water and contains large numbers of intraoral taste buds in their tongue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%