1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf01048531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution and proportion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the project of setting up a systematic typology of Aristotelian diagrams, it has been shown that there are exactly 18 families of octagons of opposition [42]. In this paper, we will not deal with all these families, but rather focus on some of the most well-known ones: the Moretti-Pellissier octagons [48,49], the Lenzen octagons [50][51][52], the Buridan octagons [53][54][55], the Beziau octagons [56,57], and the Keynes-Johnson octagons [58,59] (see Figures 7 and 8). Once again, these families of octagons (and also the other ones, which we do not deal with in this paper) can straightforwardly be characterized in AD-logic.…”
Section: Characterizing Some Aristotelian Families Of Octagons Of Opp...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the project of setting up a systematic typology of Aristotelian diagrams, it has been shown that there are exactly 18 families of octagons of opposition [42]. In this paper, we will not deal with all these families, but rather focus on some of the most well-known ones: the Moretti-Pellissier octagons [48,49], the Lenzen octagons [50][51][52], the Buridan octagons [53][54][55], the Beziau octagons [56,57], and the Keynes-Johnson octagons [58,59] (see Figures 7 and 8). Once again, these families of octagons (and also the other ones, which we do not deal with in this paper) can straightforwardly be characterized in AD-logic.…”
Section: Characterizing Some Aristotelian Families Of Octagons Of Opp...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Syllogism, a type of deductive inference, is based on the relationship among sets and their cardinalities. Because of this, the reasoning process is directly linked with the classical distribution problem [25], i.e., how the elements of the referential fulfill the properties or terms in the statements. Thus, from this point of view, each one of the premises of the syllogism is a restriction that delimits the distribution and the conclusion is another constraint that must be compatible with the distribution described in the premises.…”
Section: General Inference Schema For Syllogistic Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%