2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0269-7491(02)00111-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution and relationships of trace metals in soft tissue, byssus and shells of Mytilus edulis trossulus from the southern Baltic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
64
1
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
4
64
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Oneway analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc least significant difference tests followed by correlation analysis (bivariate correlations) were used to extract information from the chemical analysis in order to find out the relationships among the trace elements (Capelli et al, 2000;Szefer et al, 2002). In this work, the results of chemical analysis were presented as mean7 SD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oneway analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc least significant difference tests followed by correlation analysis (bivariate correlations) were used to extract information from the chemical analysis in order to find out the relationships among the trace elements (Capelli et al, 2000;Szefer et al, 2002). In this work, the results of chemical analysis were presented as mean7 SD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multivariate analysis methods such as one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), principal component analysis (PCA), and correlation analysis (bivariate correlations) have been used to extract information from the chemical analysis in order to find the relationships among these heavy metals in organisms (Foster, 1995;Szefer et al, 1998Szefer et al, , 1999bSzefer et al, , 2002Holmes et al, 1998;Lucila Lares et al, 2002;Capelli et al, 2000;Kim, 1995). In this work, the results of chemical analyses were presented as mean T S.E.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several animal species have been suggested to be suitable for the monitoring of environmental pollution. Mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) (Binelli et al, 2001;Szefe et al, 2002); herrings (Clupea harengus), and partridges (Alectoris rufa) (Herrera et al, 2000) or even mammals such as cattle (López-Alonso et al, 2002) and fox (Corsolini et al, 2000) have been suggested for the monitoring of environmental pollution. Since 1970, honeybees (Apis mellifera) have increasingly been used to monitor heavy metal environmental pollutants as reported in some studies (Porrini et al, 2002;Bromenshenk et al, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%