Distribution Network Line Power Loss Evaluation with Grid Connected Rooftop Photovoltaic Systems Utilizing Over Voltage Mitigation Techniques

Review on voltage‐violation mitigation techniques of distribution networks with distributed rooftop PV systems

“…D‐STATCOM is installed at bus eight. The incremented iterative to determine the required reactive power based on the BFS method is presented in [80]. The second target is better than the first target in applying the RPC technique.…”

“…Therefore, STSs at the feeder end have the priority to rearrange. Nour et al [80] use the particle swarm algorithm to rearrange all loads along the feeder. In this paper, it is sufficient to rearrange the last three buses to mitigate voltage rise while mitigating the VU needs to rearrange the last four buses.…”

“…Nour et al [80] investigate the voltage‐violation mitigation techniques at 12 PM based on the ability to alleviate the voltage rise only. At this time of the day, the highest PV generation occurs while loads’ consumption is normally at their lowest value.…”

Voltage violation in four‐wire distribution networks integrated with rooftop PV systems

“…Assuming that, each bus supplies equal current along the feeder. The feeder voltage profile is directly proportional to the summation of number buses and inverse proportional to the square of the total number of buses as expressed in (9) ΔV ∝ 1…”

“…Another method for mitigating the VU depended on re‐arrangement of loads via static transfer switch from phase to another based on a central controller was proposed in [8]. The active power curtailment was advised in [9] for reducing the generated PV power based on the overvoltage value. As an aspect of line power loss for the distribution network, the active power curtailment technique has the lowest line power loss followed by active power‐dependent while reactive power control is the highest.…”