Distribution of a Hierarchical Component in a Non-Connected Environment

Hoareau, Didier; Mahéo, Yves

doi:10.1109/euromicro.2005.23

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A disconnection can then be captured with the result that bindings between components are withdrawn and the corresponding interfaces are deactivated. Further details can be found in [2].…”

Section: Implementation Statusmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In particular, the two following aspects have to be dealt with: (1) how to deploy a hierarchical component in a dynamic network while ensuring that this deployment respects the architecture of the application and adapts itself to the resource constraints imposed by the target platform? (2) how to allow a distributed execution of the components, i.e. to allow interactions between components in a not-always-connected environment?…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Constraint-Based Deployment of Distributed Components in a Dynamic Network

Hoareau¹,

Mahéo²

2006

Architecture of Computing Systems - ARCS 2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Hierarchical software components offer interesting characteristics for the development of complex applications. However, supporting the deployment of such applications is difficult, especially on challenging distributed platforms. This paper addresses the distribution and the deployment of hierarchical components on heterogeneous dynamic networks. Such networks may include fixed and mobile resource-constrained devices and are characterized by the volatility of their hosts and connections, which may lead to their fragmentation. The distribution scheme and the associated mechanisms we propose allow a component to provide its services in an ubiquitous way and to operate in a degraded mode. The deployment of hierarchical components is described: we present an ADL extension for specifying a context-aware deployment and we detail a hierarchicallycontrolled deployment designed for dynamic networks. This deployment is performed in a propagative way and is driven by constraints put on the resources of the target hosts.

show abstract

“…A disconnection can then be captured with the result that bindings between components are withdrawn and the corresponding interfaces are deactivated. Further details can be found in [2].…”

Section: Implementation Statusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Constraint-Based Deployment of Distributed Components in a Dynamic Network

Hoareau¹,

Mahéo²

2006

Architecture of Computing Systems - ARCS 2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Each primitive component is localized on a single host, which reflects the semantics of the architecture descriptor in which each reference to a component corresponds one (possibly statefull) component. Further details about the distribution and the support of this distributed hierarchical component model can be found in [5].…”

Section: Distributed Hierarchical Component Model For Dynamic Networkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Propagative Deployment of Hierarchical Components in a Dynamic Network

Hoareau¹,

Mahéo²

2005

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. This paper addresses the distribution and the deployment of hierarchical components on heterogeneous dynamic networks. Such networks may include fixed and mobile resource-constrained devices and are characterized by the volatility of their hosts and connections, which may lead to their fragmentation. We propose a propagative, hierarchically-controlled deployment process for such networks and an ADL extension allowing the specification of this context-aware deployment.

show abstract