2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.103131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of and hydrographic controls on ferromanganese crusts: Tropic Seamount, Atlantic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with loose sediments, transitional zone deposits experience a lower degree of mobilisation on seamount slopes. Similar observations have been presented by Yeo et al 25 . All the lithotypes in this study are shown in Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with loose sediments, transitional zone deposits experience a lower degree of mobilisation on seamount slopes. Similar observations have been presented by Yeo et al 25 . All the lithotypes in this study are shown in Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Intense topographical changes on the slope, such as landslides, slope collapse and volcanic activity (which ceased in the Late Cretaceous in this case) on intraplate seamounts 10,42 , play a role in clearing deposits from seamount slopes and burying old deposits on slopes 25 . After past deposits have been removed, the seamount flank would consist exposed rock and would eventually experience build-up of new deposits.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Eroded botryoids of the top surface of the second generation in some samples corroborated this erosional process. Bottom currents of more than 0.2 m/s may be capable of eroding Fe-Mn crust surfaces [53]. The prevalence of columnar and mottled texture is related to a higher amount of biogenic particle input that constrains or interrupts the formation of laminations [54].…”
Section: Two Generations Of Fe-mn Crusts On Rio Grande Risementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that all samples were dredged during cruises that were not dedicated to study crusts and that sample recovery is strongly impacted by seabed and outcrop morphology. Fe-Mn crusts recovered by ROV along depth transects usually show no variation in crust thicknesses [84,85]. The two thickest crusts (GO327: 115 mm, DR11Ai: 97 mm) are situated respectively at 1820 m and 2375 m. Crust thicknesses have been measured for every sample where the right-way up was evident and for crusts with or without substrate.…”
Section: Crusts Chemical Changes With Water Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%