1979
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1979.tb01202.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of Bacterial Contaminants in a South African Lager Brewery

Abstract: Bacteria isolated from contaminated pitching yeast, fermenting wort and beer samples from a South African lager brewery over a one‐year period were tentatively identified by an improved, rapid diagnostic procedure as pediococci (41%), homofermentative lactobacilli (5%), heterofermentative lactobacilli (9%), Acetobacter spp. (7%), Gluconobacter spp. (13%) and Hafnia protea (25%). Pediococci and lactobacilli dominated samples taken from fermentation, storage and ‘bright’ beer tanks but were absent from pitched w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Van Vuuren et al . also found that samples from fermentation and storages tanks were occasionally contaminated with Acetobacter and Gluconobacter . Furthermore, Ingledew reported an increased incidence of acetic acid bacterial spoilage in draught beer kegs.…”
Section: Bacteria In Brewing: the Badmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Van Vuuren et al . also found that samples from fermentation and storages tanks were occasionally contaminated with Acetobacter and Gluconobacter . Furthermore, Ingledew reported an increased incidence of acetic acid bacterial spoilage in draught beer kegs.…”
Section: Bacteria In Brewing: the Badmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Ploss and co-workers (101) found that these contaminants were only found in samples from the filling and filtration processes of the brewery, with 70% of the contamination belonging to A. pasteurianis sub pasteurianis. Van Vuuren et al (102) also found that samples from fermentation and storages tanks were occasionally contaminated with Acetobacter and Gluconobacter. Furthermore, Ingledew (99) reported an increased incidence of acetic acid bacterial spoilage in draught beer kegs.…”
Section: Acetic Acid Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequent incidents of beer spoilage in draught beer kegs have been reported (Ingledew, 1979). Acetobacter and Glucono bacter have also occasionally been found in samples from beer fermentation and storage tanks (van Vuuren, Loos, Louw, & Meisel, 1979). AAB are still prevalent in cask-conditioned and barrel-aged beers (Bokulich, Bamforth, & Mills, 2012) (Table 8.2).…”
Section: Occurrence and Beer Spoilage Abilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequent incidents of beer spoilage in draught beer kegs have been reported [24]. Acetobacter and Gluconobacter have also been occasionally found in samples from beer fermentation and storage tanks [39]. AAB are still prevalent in cask conditioned and barrel aged beers [40].…”
Section: Acetic Acid Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%