2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa692e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of Captured Planetesimals in Circumplanetary Gas Disks and Implications for Accretion of Regular Satellites

Abstract: Regular satellites of giant planets are formed by accretion of solid bodies in circumplanetary disks. Planetesimals that are moving on heliocentric orbits and are sufficiently large to be decoupled from the flow of the protoplanetary gas disk can be captured by gas drag from the circumplanetary disk. In the present work, we examine the distribution of captured planetesimals in circumplanetary disks using orbital integrations. We find that the number of captured planetesimals reaches an equilibrium state as a b… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4 shows that the distributions of orbital parameters of the objects at the time of their capture are quite similar in the most favorable scenarios of cases 1 and 2. Similar trends were obtained by Suetsugu & Ohtsuki (2017) although they considered that planetesimals initially populate the close vicinity of Jupiter (i.e., the region inside of Jupiter's gap in our configuration) and no other massive object but Jupiter perturbed their orbits. It should be noted that the distribution of objects in Figure 4 is not representative of the system at a particular time because the planetesimals were not all captured concurrently.…”
Section: Evolution Of Captured Planetesimalssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 4 shows that the distributions of orbital parameters of the objects at the time of their capture are quite similar in the most favorable scenarios of cases 1 and 2. Similar trends were obtained by Suetsugu & Ohtsuki (2017) although they considered that planetesimals initially populate the close vicinity of Jupiter (i.e., the region inside of Jupiter's gap in our configuration) and no other massive object but Jupiter perturbed their orbits. It should be noted that the distribution of objects in Figure 4 is not representative of the system at a particular time because the planetesimals were not all captured concurrently.…”
Section: Evolution Of Captured Planetesimalssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…It would be surprising were such a reservoir to have existed close to Jupiter and not play any role in the formation of its regular satellites, the origin of whose building blocks remains elusive. Yet, as demonstrated by Suetsugu & Ohtsuki (2017), if the objects of the reservoir were on circular and coplanar orbits, as expected from their formation process, they would have mainly remained out of Jupiter's reach. However, there is now little doubt that Saturn once was orbiting much closer to Jupiter than it is currently (see e.g., Deienno et al 2017, and references therein).…”
Section: Existence Of a Reservoir Of Planetesimals Close To Jupitermentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We aim to find a way to form a system with only one large moon in a CPD. The feasibility of satellitesimal formation has been examined by Shibaike et al (2017) and delivery of solid matereal to a CPD has been discussed by Fujita et al (2012); Tanigawa et al (2014); Suetsugu & Ohtsuki (2017); Ronnet et al (2018). We focus on the later stage of the satellite formation and investigate the orbital evolution of the moons in a dissipating CPD to determine the final appearance of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suetsugu et al (2016) and Suetsugu & Ohtsuki (2017) examined the captures and subsequent orbital evolutions of planetesimals. They showed that the capture hypothesis could roughly reproduce the initial radial distribution of planetesimals (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%