2021
DOI: 10.32322/jhsm.981918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of clinical isolates obtained from sterile body fluids: a four-year retrospective data

Abstract: Aim: Infections of sterile body fluids (SBFs) require rapid and accurate diagnosis and treatment, since their morbidities and mortalities are high. To achieve this goal, definite epidemiologic data is absolutely required, since empiric and preemptive treatments are mainly based on this. The aim of this study was to evaluate infectious agents isolated from SBFs, susceptibility results and molecular analysis (PCR) data, retrospectively. Material and Method: Clinical samples of SBFs (Cerebrospinal, pleural,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[14] Previously, from our center, 41% of S. aureus isolates from blood cultures were found to be MRSA and only one MRSA isolate was detected from SBFs in three-and fouryear periods. [15,16] In addition, fluoroquinolone resistance did not seem to change over years in UAMDSS, which was also compatible with CAESAR data and findings of this study. In this study, there was not any statistically significant alteration in the resistance rates of all tested antibiotics during the three-year period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…[14] Previously, from our center, 41% of S. aureus isolates from blood cultures were found to be MRSA and only one MRSA isolate was detected from SBFs in three-and fouryear periods. [15,16] In addition, fluoroquinolone resistance did not seem to change over years in UAMDSS, which was also compatible with CAESAR data and findings of this study. In this study, there was not any statistically significant alteration in the resistance rates of all tested antibiotics during the three-year period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%