Distribution of CORE–OM scores in a general population, clinical
                        cut-off points and comparison with the CIS–R

Connell, Janice; Barkham, Michael; Stiles, William B.; Twigg, Elspeth; Singleton, Nicola; Evans, Olga; Miles, Jeremy N. V.

doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.105.017657

Cited by 176 publications

(203 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

189

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Those patients, whose baseline scores were under the cut-off C value were not categorized in this way. The results quoted by Connell et al (2007) for a non-patient population were used when calculating the RCI and cut-off for CORE-OM.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is interpersonal counselling (IPC) sufficient treatment for depression in primary care patients? A pilot study comparing IPC and interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT)

Kontunen

Timonen

Muotka

et al. 2016

Journal of Affective Disorders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is interpersonal counselling (IPC) sufficient treatment for depression in primary care patients? A pilot study comparing IPC and interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT)

Kontunen

Timonen

Muotka

et al. 2016

Journal of Affective Disorders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Respondents are asked to indicate how often they have felt or behaved in ways described over the previous week on a five-point scale (0-4). The questionnaire is scored by calculating the mean item rating (reversing ratings for positive statements) and multiplying by ten, giving a scale from zero to 40, with higher scores reflecting greater mental distress (Connell et al, 2007;Gray and Mellor-Clark, 2007). The short version of the CORE consists of 10 items (CORE-10) and a simple sum of ratings (with reverse scoring for two positive items) also produces a scale running from 0 to 40.…”

Section: Clinical Outcomes In Routine Evaluation Questionnaires (Corementioning

confidence: 99%

Further evidence that singing fosters mental health and wellbeing: the West Kent and Medway project

Clift

Manship

Stephens

2017

MHSI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Clift and Morrison (2011) report that weekly singing over eight months for people with enduring mental health issues led to clinically important reductions in mental distress. The purpose of this paper is to test the robustness of the earlier findings. Design/methodology/approach Four community singing groups for people with mental health issues ran weekly from November 2014 to the end of 2015. Evaluation place over a six-month period using two validated questionnaires: the short Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE-10) questionnaire, and the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS). Findings In all, 26 participants completed baseline and follow-up questionnaires. CORE-10 scores were significantly reduced, and WEMWBS scores significantly increased. Comparisons with the earlier study found a similar pattern of improvements on CORE items that are part of the “problems” sub-scale in the full CORE questionnaire. There was also evidence from both studies of participants showing clinically important improvements in CORE-10 scores. Research limitations/implications The main limitations of the study are a small sample size and the lack of a randomised control group. Originality/value No attempts have been made previously to directly test the transferability of a singing for health model to a new geographical area and to evaluate outcomes using the same validated measure.

show abstract

“…Taking an aggregated sample (n = 10,761) from previous research studies a mean cut-off score of .99 was obtained when compared with a general population sample (Connell et al, 2007). The index for assessing reliable and clinically significant change was calculated for the CORE-OM using the method proposed by Jacobson and Truax (1991).…”

Section: Barrett-lennardmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mutuality of Rogers's therapeutic conditions and treatment progress in the first three psychotherapy sessions

Murphy

Cramer

2014

Psychotherapy Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Research on the effects of Rogers's therapeutic relationship conditions has typically focused on the unilateral provision of empathy, unconditional positive regard, and congruence from therapist to client. Method: This study looked at both client and therapist mutuality of the Rogerian therapeutic conditions and the association between mutuality and treatment progress in the first three psychotherapy sessions. Clients (N = 62; mean age = 24.32; 77% female, 23% male) and therapists (N = 12; mean age = 34.32; nine female and three male) rated one another using the Barrett-Lennard Relationship Inventory after the first and third session. Results: Both clients and therapists perceived the quality of the relationship as improved over time. Client rating of psychological distress (CORE-OM) was lower after session 3 than at session 1 (es = .85, [95% CIs: .67, 1.03]). Hierarchical multiple regression was used to test the predictive power of mutually high levels of the therapeutic conditions on treatment progress. The association between client rating of therapist-provided conditions and treatment progress at session 3 was higher when both clients and therapists rated each other as providing high levels of the therapeutic conditions (R 2 change = .073, p < .03). Conclusions: The findings suggest mutuality of Rogers's therapeutic conditions is related to treatment progress.

show abstract

Distribution of CORE–OM scores in a general population, clinical cut-off points and comparison with the CIS–R

Abstract: We recommend rounding the CORE-OM cut-off score to 10. However, cut-off scores must be used thoughtfully and adjusted to fit context and purpose.

Cited by 176 publications

References 20 publications

Is interpersonal counselling (IPC) sufficient treatment for depression in primary care patients? A pilot study comparing IPC and interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT)

Is interpersonal counselling (IPC) sufficient treatment for depression in primary care patients? A pilot study comparing IPC and interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT)

Further evidence that singing fosters mental health and wellbeing: the West Kent and Medway project

Mutuality of Rogers's therapeutic conditions and treatment progress in the first three psychotherapy sessions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About