“…While this study reports low heritabilities, many studies have documented population differences in the expression of the trait (Huang and Creath, 1995;Lavelle, 1970;McVay and Latta, 1984;Scott and Irish, 2017), which suggests the utility of the trait in bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology. Further, as several studies have illustrated prevalence rates of canine diastemata in different populations (e.g., Keene, 1963), this trait may have value in biological anthropological studies as well.…”