Lacame 2006 2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85559-0_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of Fe-bearing compounds in an Ultisol as determined with selective chemical dissolution and Mössbauer spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An analogous behaviour is observed for Si and Al extracted by these methods (Pizarro et al, 2008a). (Pizarro et al, 2003).…”
Section: Chemically Treated Silt and Clay Fractionssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…An analogous behaviour is observed for Si and Al extracted by these methods (Pizarro et al, 2008a). (Pizarro et al, 2003).…”
Section: Chemically Treated Silt and Clay Fractionssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In contrast, Iron-bearing minerals from soils developing on volcanic materials from Southern Chile analysis of the silt-size fraction from the same Ultisol revealed the dominant iron oxide to be oxidized magnetite (Pizarro et al 2000a and b). Finally, results from Pizarro et al (2008) revealed the presence of maghemite, goethite, and hematite minerals in the clay-size soil fraction from Ultisol. However, similar analysis of Andisol soil samples revealed the persistence of paramagnetic Fe 2+ and Fe 3+ species (the last one possibly assignable as a ferrihydrite-like mineral bonded to aluminosilicate structures) throughout all size fractions (Pizarro et al 2000a and b;2001;2008).…”
Section: Technological Applications Of Natural Iron Oxidesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Chilean volcanic Ultisols contain a diverse array of iron oxide minerals with generally higher crystalline order compared to Andisol (Mella and Kuhne 1985;Pizarro et al 2017) and possess different dominant iron oxide forms depending on the soil size-fraction: partially oxidised magnetite in the sand-size fraction, oxidized magnetite in the silt-size fraction, and maghemite in the clay-size fraction (Pizarro et al 2000a(Pizarro et al , 2000b(Pizarro et al , 2001(Pizarro et al , 2005(Pizarro et al , 2017 after the fifth, attributed to aluminium re-precipitation process over the solid particles (Manzo et al 2011). Kwan and Voelker (2003) NaOH treatments are presented on Figure 4 (Adapted from Pizarro et al 2008 andManzo et al 2011). Manzo et al (2011) since no more than 0.02 mg L -1 of soluble iron was quantified during catalysis assays.…”
Section: Fenton Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of crystalline minerals, such as kaolinite, halloysite, and Al/Fe oxides will be significant in the IPD mechanism in ultisols [5,35]. The way minerals, present on VADS, are interrelated or chemically spatially distributed, either being freely distributed throughout the soil mass or coating silt and clay grains, is determinant on their chemical role in the whole ion adsorption-desorption mechanisms [7]. The different mineral composition of VADS will have an impact on their different physical behavior, influencing the INIH adsorption rate, the adsorption mechanism involved, and the INIH adsorption capacity.…”
Section: Figure 3 (A) Pso Model For Adsorption Kinetics Of Gps On Ulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allophane plays a key role in surface reactivity in andisols determining the availability of nutrients and controlling soil contaminant behavior [6]. Ultisols have a low amount of OM, relatively high amounts of Fe oxides in different degrees of crystallinity, low base saturation (<30%), high bulk density (0.8-1.1 Mg m −3 ), and high clay content (>40%) [2,7]. This last component provides a finer texture that allows a greater cohesion with respect to andisols [2,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%