1986
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.34.8071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of fractal clusters and scaling in the Ising model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
32
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This seems to correspond to the estimated exponent for percolating clusters [29,30], τ = 2 + confirmation of the critical nature of our observations. In this section we have shown that clusters at T * (L) show, rather remarkably, both scale free behaviour, and a separation of scales: Typical cluster size, maximum secondary cluster size and spanning cluster size are all fixed by L, however their amplitudes are sufficiently different to ensure a minimum of interference between the three scales.…”
Section: Cluster Sizes and Distributionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This seems to correspond to the estimated exponent for percolating clusters [29,30], τ = 2 + confirmation of the critical nature of our observations. In this section we have shown that clusters at T * (L) show, rather remarkably, both scale free behaviour, and a separation of scales: Typical cluster size, maximum secondary cluster size and spanning cluster size are all fixed by L, however their amplitudes are sufficiently different to ensure a minimum of interference between the three scales.…”
Section: Cluster Sizes and Distributionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, this suggested fractal dimension is not consistent with numerical results [7]. The reason is that there are actually two contributions in forming a cluster: One is due to the correlation due to the spin interaction, while the other is a purely geometric contribution which survives even in the infinite-T limit [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…As to an intuitive explanation for the postcritical peak in T gl , preliminary research implicates a subtle interplay between differing contributions to T gl from sites within and on the boundaries of same-spin domains, and the change in distribution of domain sizes as the temperature increases and domains disintegrate [22]. A complementary perspective is offered in Ref.…”
Section: Critical Inverse Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%