1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0044-8486(97)00027-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of genetic variance in gynogenetic or androgenetic families

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present case each family was reared separately and this may have also had a confounding effect with the additive genetic effect and may have inflated the heritability estimates. The estimated heritability values obtained in our study are similar to other studies conducted in food fishes like trouts (McKay 1986;Perry 2005;Gjerde et al 1994, Quinton et al 2005, Bongers et al 1997) and guppy (Nakajima and Fujio 1993). The genetic correlation estimated for body weight and standard length was strong and positive (0.88±0.003).…”
Section: Breedingsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In the present case each family was reared separately and this may have also had a confounding effect with the additive genetic effect and may have inflated the heritability estimates. The estimated heritability values obtained in our study are similar to other studies conducted in food fishes like trouts (McKay 1986;Perry 2005;Gjerde et al 1994, Quinton et al 2005, Bongers et al 1997) and guppy (Nakajima and Fujio 1993). The genetic correlation estimated for body weight and standard length was strong and positive (0.88±0.003).…”
Section: Breedingsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This might have been the reason why the residual variance was overestimated. The estimated heritability for body weight in Japanese flounder was similar to that in Atlantic salmon and slightly lower than those for rainbow trout and carp [21][22][23][24][25][26]. The estimated heritabilities of body weight and body length were 0.09 and 0.16 at 150 days of age, 0.29 and 0.37 at 280 days of age, and 0.17 and 0.23 at 2.5 years of age, respectively, in rainbow trout [27,28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The estimation methods of heritability in the common carp include parent-offspring regression (Nenashev, 1966;Zhang et al, 1981), family analysis (Nenashev, 1966; Nagy et al, 1980;Wang et al, 2006c), animal model (Bongers et al, 1997;Tanck et al, 2001), and mixed genetic model (Wang et al, 2006d). The existing environmental effects cause bias in parent-offspring regression.…”
Section: Heritabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%