2023
DOI: 10.7883/yoken.jjid.2022.704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of Human Sapovirus Strain Genotypes over the Last Four Decades in Japan: a Global Perspective

Abstract: Sapovirus (SaV) infections are a public health problem because they cause acute gastroenteritis in humans of all ages both as outbreaks and in sporadic cases. However, publicly-available SaV sequence information, especially whole genome sequences for all the SaV genotypes, is still limited. Therefore, in this study, we determined the full/near-full-length genomic sequences of 138 SaVs from the 2001-2015 seasons in 13 prefectures across Japan. The GI genogroup was predominant (67%, n = 92), followed by GII (18%… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study in Vietnam (2007Vietnam ( -2008 that included a single hospital detected three genotypes: GI.1, GI.2, and GII.1, while another study in Japan from 2014 to 2017 reported six SaV circulating genotypes: GI.1, GII.1, GIV.1, GI.2, GI.3, and GII.3, of which the proportion of GI.1 (83.3%) was higher than that in most other studies [28,32]. Genotypes GI.1 and GI.2 were the predominant circulating strains in other Asian countries and globally [33,34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A study in Vietnam (2007Vietnam ( -2008 that included a single hospital detected three genotypes: GI.1, GI.2, and GII.1, while another study in Japan from 2014 to 2017 reported six SaV circulating genotypes: GI.1, GII.1, GIV.1, GI.2, GI.3, and GII.3, of which the proportion of GI.1 (83.3%) was higher than that in most other studies [28,32]. Genotypes GI.1 and GI.2 were the predominant circulating strains in other Asian countries and globally [33,34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%