1959
DOI: 10.1038/183616a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of Kappa-Casein in Skim Milk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
13
0
2

Year Published

1960
1960
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They further concluded that since the p-casein that is solubilized from the whole casein may be a very small portion of whole casein, no effect on the &-casein: g-casein ratios in the sedimented fractions may be dis cernable but would be discernable in the non-sedimented fraction since this fraction contains only 5-15 percent of the total casein. The authors (Yamauchi and Tsugo, 1962) The results of Rose (1965) and Sullivan _et al (1959) are in agreement as regards h-casein contents; however, the fact that Sullivan _al. could show no difference between the original casein and its "subfractions" by moving boundary, implies that a corresponding decrease in a^-casein should be obtained rather than the decrease in g-casein as reported by Rose (1965).…”
Section: Relationship Between the Sizes Of The Caseinate Micelles Andsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They further concluded that since the p-casein that is solubilized from the whole casein may be a very small portion of whole casein, no effect on the &-casein: g-casein ratios in the sedimented fractions may be dis cernable but would be discernable in the non-sedimented fraction since this fraction contains only 5-15 percent of the total casein. The authors (Yamauchi and Tsugo, 1962) The results of Rose (1965) and Sullivan _et al (1959) are in agreement as regards h-casein contents; however, the fact that Sullivan _al. could show no difference between the original casein and its "subfractions" by moving boundary, implies that a corresponding decrease in a^-casein should be obtained rather than the decrease in g-casein as reported by Rose (1965).…”
Section: Relationship Between the Sizes Of The Caseinate Micelles Andsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…All samples were dispersed in sample gel solutions containing a tris-citrate buffer (pH 6.9). Swaisgood and Brunner (1962), because the whey-soluble fraction has been shown, in this study and by others, to contain a high %-casein concentration (Table 9) (Rose, 1965 andSullivan et al, 1959 (Tables 15 and 16). The total area under the densitometer trace of the 20-hour fraction, which had a protein concentration of All samples were dispersed in sample gel solutions containing a 6.6 M urea-tris-citrate buffer, pH 6.9.…”
Section: Disc Electrophoretic Patterns Without Ureamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En effet, elle paraît particulièrement douée de fraction IX qui renferme la caséine K [13] [18]; c'est la caséine qui réagit avec la présure, tandis qu'elle est plus pauvre en fraction~qui, suivant la démonstration de PYNE [12], remplit la fonction de colloïde protecteur [18] et tend par conséquent à ralentir la coagulation même.…”
Section: Examen éLectrophorétlque Des Caséines Transparente Et Opaqueunclassified
“…This could be due to the ionic environment of the milk, the amount ofK-casein in the milk, which may determine the size of the casein micelles (Sullivan, Fitzpatrick & Stanton, 1959), or the composition of the K-casein. Variation in K-casein composition is largely due to differences in the carbohydrates attached to it (Mackinlay & Wake, 1965).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%