1975
DOI: 10.1099/00221287-91-2-391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of  -Lactamases A and B in some Groups of Yersinia enterocolitica and their Role in Resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

1976
1976
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…E. coli NLL-MetRS with mutations L13N, Y360L, and H301L was isolated from pJTN1 (7) by Nhe1 digestion and inserted into pQE80 (Qiagen). Kanamycin resistance was used for selection, because Y. enterocolitica is resistant to ampicillin (48) and nalidixic acid. The resulting plasmid, which carries NLL-MetRS under control of the endogenous E. coli MetG promoter, is termed pAM1 and has been deposited in Addgene.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E. coli NLL-MetRS with mutations L13N, Y360L, and H301L was isolated from pJTN1 (7) by Nhe1 digestion and inserted into pQE80 (Qiagen). Kanamycin resistance was used for selection, because Y. enterocolitica is resistant to ampicillin (48) and nalidixic acid. The resulting plasmid, which carries NLL-MetRS under control of the endogenous E. coli MetG promoter, is termed pAM1 and has been deposited in Addgene.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several 1-lactamases including 1-lactamases A and B were found to be produced by Y. enterocolitica strains (3)(4)(5) and associated with serotypes (3,14). Production of 3-lactamase is a resistance mechanism which could explain the clinical inefficiency of 1-lactamase-hydrolyzable antibiotics such as ampicillin and cephalothin against Y. enterocolitica infections (15,20,25).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is considerable disagreement as to the relative importance of beta-lactamases in bacterial resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics (20). Because of the lack of uniform correlation between in vitro minimal inhibitory concentration values and lability of these compounds to enzymatic hydrolysis (1,10,11), this lability, by itself, is not sufficient evidence to predict bacterial susceptibility. Despite this, it is probable that the action of these enzymes does contribute to resistance although not always as the limiting factor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%