. 1
Introduction 1The nuclear fuel cycle generates a considerable amount of radioactive waste, which often 2 includes nuclear fission products, such as strontium-90 ( 90 Sr) and cesium-137 ( 137 Cs), and actinides 3 such as uranium (U) and plutonium (Pu). When released into the environment, large quantities of 4 these radionuclides can present considerable problems to man and biota due to their radioactive 5 nature and, in some cases as with the actinides, their chemical toxicity. Radionuclides are expected 6 to decay at a known rate. Yet, research has shown the rate of elimination from an ecosystem to differ 7 from the decay rate due to physical, chemical and biological processes that remove the contaminant 8 or reduce its biological availability. 1 Knowledge regarding the rate by which a contaminant is 9 eliminated from an ecosystem (ecological half-life) is important for evaluating the duration and 10 potential severity of risk. To better understand a contaminants impact on an environment, 11 consideration should be given to plants. As primary producers, they represent an important mode of 12 contamination transfer from sediments and soils into the food chain. Contaminants that are 13 chemically and/or physically sequestered in a media are less likely to be bio-available to plants and 14 therefore an ecosystem. 15It is widely accepted that the sorption capacity of a soil, particularly particle size distribution 16 (sand, silt and clay percentages) and mineralogy, play a large role in the availability of radionuclides 17 to plants. 2,3,4,5 However, these parameters are unable to account for the variations of concentrations 18 found in different plant species. 6,7,8,9 Plants will often accumulate contamination as a consequence of 19 mineral and nutrient attainment. Plants that have shown an ability to accumulate high concentrations 20 of radionuclides have garnered recent interest for their potential to act as bio-monitors in helping 21 identify areas of ecological and transport risk. 10 The purpose of this study was to reexamine 22 established and identify potential new plant species that are active accumulators of radionuclides in 23 terrestrial, lotic and lentic environments. 11,12,13 As such, this study took place in an area known to be 24 impacted by nuclear processing: the Savannah River Site (SRS) in Aiken, South Carolina (SC). The 25 SRS is a Dept. of Energy (DOE) site that produced primarily tritium and Pu used in the fabrication of 26 nuclear weapons from 1952 to 1988. The SRS utilized natural streams, series of canals and 27 reservoirs to disperse heat from nuclear reactors. As a result of routine discharges, routine leaks in 28 the heat exchangers, and occasional leaks in fuel and core elements, over 50 radionuclides were 29 released to the atmosphere, to onsite streams, and to seepage basins. 14 Since production was halted in 30 the late 1980s, the primary mission of the DOE at the SRS has been environmental cleanup. 31Macrophytes and stream-side terrestrial plants from areas impacted by operations...