2015
DOI: 10.3109/03008207.2015.1013627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of mesoscale elastic properties and mass density in the human femoral shaft

Abstract: Cortical bone properties are determined by tissue composition and structure at several hierarchical length scales. In this study, the spatial distribution of micro- and mesoscale elastic properties within a human femoral shaft has been investigated. Microscale tissue degree of mineralization (DMB), cortical vascular porosity Ct.Po and the average transverse isotropic stiffness tensor C(Micro) of cylindrical-shaped samples (diameter: 4.4 mm, N = 56) were obtained from cortical regions between 20 and 85% of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simple homogenization models of cortical bone assuming a bone matrix with fixed properties and a cylindrical porosity of variable volume fraction (Granke et al 2011;Parnell et al 2012;Hellmich et al 2008) are consistent with this observation. However, there are evidences that the variation of elastic coefficients is not only due to the varying porosity only but also to variations of the stiffness of the bone matrix (Rho et al 2002;Granke et al 2011;Rohrbach et al 2015). The bone matrix should be less stiff (younger) and more porous when remodeling is more intense and stiffer and less porous when remodeling is less intense.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simple homogenization models of cortical bone assuming a bone matrix with fixed properties and a cylindrical porosity of variable volume fraction (Granke et al 2011;Parnell et al 2012;Hellmich et al 2008) are consistent with this observation. However, there are evidences that the variation of elastic coefficients is not only due to the varying porosity only but also to variations of the stiffness of the bone matrix (Rho et al 2002;Granke et al 2011;Rohrbach et al 2015). The bone matrix should be less stiff (younger) and more porous when remodeling is more intense and stiffer and less porous when remodeling is less intense.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies showed that knee flexion is usually the later CMs and is more often recruited in prolonged and severe sagittal malalignment in subjects with severely degenerative spine when spinal and pelvic compensations are inadequate to restore proper postural balance 4,33–35 . The regional heterogeneity of femoral shaft nature was revealed by previous studies, where posterior region exhibited the highest porosity, smallest density, and lowest stiffness values 36 . Zhang et al discovered that femoral bowing was negatively associated with femoral cortical thickness and significantly increased in the aging process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…To approve the in vivo feasibility of the multifocus imaging technique, the implementation of the aforementioned phase-aberration corrections, more sophisticated algorithms for the detection of the bone surface, eventually in combination with edge-enhancing image filters are required. Moreover, the method can only be applied with the imaging plane parallel to the plane of transverse isotropy, i.e., the radial direction perpendicular to the long bone axes [40]. Potential measurement regions are shaft regions, in which the cortical thickness is not much smaller than 1 mm, and the geometry is approximately plate-shaped, e.g., the medial portion of the tibia.…”
Section: Transition To In Vivo Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%