2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of methamphetamine and amphetamine in drug abusers’ head hair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The levels detected appear to be very similar to those detected in the hair of adult users from several studies [13,14]. The mean values are very similar whilst the median value is two times higher for the children than the adult users analysed here.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The levels detected appear to be very similar to those detected in the hair of adult users from several studies [13,14]. The mean values are very similar whilst the median value is two times higher for the children than the adult users analysed here.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Tsanaclis et al reported a range of 0.1-128 ng/mg (n = 97 [13]), whilst in another large study by Lee et al [14] a broader range and a higher mean (0.5-608.9 ng/mg, mean 21.0 ng/mg, median 10.1 ng/ mg) was reported. The study by Lee et al [14] used a cut off of 0.5 ng/mg, so would not include any MA levels in the 0.1-0.5 ng/ mg range, thus inflating the mean.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In the second study, researchers divided a sample of hair-test results (n = 2355) into "low, medium and high ranges," defined by various percentiles of MA concentrations with corresponding AM values. The high category, representing the upper 25% of the sample, comprised MA and AM concentrations of 24.5−608.9 ng/mg and 1.7−41.4 ng/mg, respectively [31]. From these findings, it appears that our protocol's AM analysis would have corroborated individual cases of MA use at all levels of detection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Nevertheless, the protocol's AM LOD would have failed to corroborate a majority of MA positives. Further, this protocol's AM LOQ would have been sensitive enough to provide data for the calculation of only a small percentage of AM/MA ratios, which can be a useful diagnostic tool for interpreting original MA dosages, the possibility of sample contamination, and the independent use of AM [30][31][32].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also divided the baseline drug concentrations values of MA into low, medium and high ranges defined, respectively, as minima to 25th percentile, 25th percentile to 75th percentile, and 75th percentile to maxima, as described by Lee et al [22]. These MA ranges corresponded to 0.2-4.2, >4.2-24.5 and >24.5-608.9 ng/ mg of hair.…”
Section: Hair Analysis: Detection and Quantitation Of Ma And Ap Aftermentioning
confidence: 99%