Distribution of Non-thyroid Neck Swellings according to Tissue of Origin and Their Radio-pathological Correlation

Abstract

Introduction: Neck swellings are commonly found and can be presented as simple benign to malignant. Due to extensive differential diagnosis and similar presentation, the evaluation of neck swellings is more challenging. Most of the cases can be diagnosed after a detailed history and clinical examination of the head and neck, but the final diagnosis will be achieved by histopathological examination. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted from February 2020 to February 2023 on the basis of retrospective and prospective sampling. This study included all the patients with neck swellings, excluding thyroid, who had undergone excisional or incisional biopsy. The present study was carried out on 74 patients with non-thyroid neck swellings, which were classified five into main headings, i.e. lymph node swelling, salivary gland swellings, adipose tissue, neural tissue and skin and soft-tissue swellings as miscellaneous. Data were collected from patient records for retrospective sampling and radiological investigation, and ultrasonography (USG) and excisional or incisional biopsy were done for prospective sampling. A radiological and pathological correlation was analysed as benign and malignant. Results: Out of the 74 patients, n = 60, 81% were benign and n = 14, 19% were malignant. The most common swelling according to the tissue of origin was lymph node (n = 31, 41.9%) followed by salivary gland n = 15 (20.3%), adipose tissue (n = 7, 9.5%) and neural tissue (n = 6, 8.1%) origin. Other soft-tissue swellings were 20.3%. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and radiological (USG) diagnosis accuracy to differentiate between benign and malignant are very similar to gold standard histopathological examination. Conclusion: Lymph node swellings were the most common swelling involving the neck region. USG diagnosis is highly sensitive for diagnosing malignant swellings but less good at confirming benign swellings. Radiological diagnosis is not a substitute for conventional surgical histopathology but is regarded as a precious complement in diagnosis. Newer diagnostic techniques are required to be infallible and accurate for further management.