1996
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(95)01202-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of Rab3a in rat nervous system: comparison with other synaptic vesicle proteins and neuropeptides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data suggests that Rab3A may be involved in the packaging of specific proteins into different vesicle subtypes that in turn may be moved by specific motor proteins. In this regard, it is remarkable that inhibition of Rab3A had no influence on the anterograde transport of synaptophysin, even though Rab3 colocalizes with synaptophysin at nerve terminals (Li et al, 1996a), and has been co-purified from synaptic vesicles in immunoisolation experiments (Fischer von Mollard et al, 1990; de Wit et al, 1999). The anti-Rab3 antibody used in these two studies does not allow differentiating between the Rab3 isoforms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data suggests that Rab3A may be involved in the packaging of specific proteins into different vesicle subtypes that in turn may be moved by specific motor proteins. In this regard, it is remarkable that inhibition of Rab3A had no influence on the anterograde transport of synaptophysin, even though Rab3 colocalizes with synaptophysin at nerve terminals (Li et al, 1996a), and has been co-purified from synaptic vesicles in immunoisolation experiments (Fischer von Mollard et al, 1990; de Wit et al, 1999). The anti-Rab3 antibody used in these two studies does not allow differentiating between the Rab3 isoforms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the rate of anterograde (proximal site to crush) and retrograde axonal transport (distal site to crush) of studied proteins, sciatic nerves were collected at 1, 3 and 6 h after the crush (Li et al ., ; Wang et al ., ), transferred immediately to 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 m phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS) and post‐fixed for 12 h at 4 °C. The following day, sections were rinsed in PBS, transferred to 20% sucrose and stored at −20 °C for further processing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%