2021
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2021-20549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of somatic cell count and udder pathogens in Norwegian dairy goats

Abstract: Compared with dairy cows, goat somatic cell count (SCC) is higher and probably more affected by physiological factors such as parity, stage of lactation, and season. Thus, SCC is believed to be a less precise indicator of intramammary infections in dairy goats, and no consensus exists on SCC thresholds for considering goats as infected. The Norwegian Goat Recording System maintains individual goat production records and results from microbiological analyses of milk samples. In this retrospective observational … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By far the highest SCC was observed for the SA group, with a mean value of 4377.83 × 10 3 cells/mL. This finding is consistent with the results of other studies that obtained a very high count in major pathogens infection [ 81 ]. However, other studies have detected similar changes regarding SCC in goat milk positive for NAS and major pathogens [ 82 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…By far the highest SCC was observed for the SA group, with a mean value of 4377.83 × 10 3 cells/mL. This finding is consistent with the results of other studies that obtained a very high count in major pathogens infection [ 81 ]. However, other studies have detected similar changes regarding SCC in goat milk positive for NAS and major pathogens [ 82 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…So far, the SCC threshold indicating mastitis in the udder of goats has not been agreed. We did not observe an effect of month/stage of lactation on SCS contrary to other studies (Paape et al, 2007;Persson et al, 2017;Smistad et al, 2021) but the relative proximity of our two samples, both in mid lactation when milk production was stabilized, could explain this observation. On the other hand, we detected a significant influence of parity on SCS, as did Smistad et al (2021).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, we detected a significant influence of parity on SCS, as did Smistad et al . (2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Milk samples from all quarters were sent to TINE Mastitis Laboratory, Molde, Norway, for microbiological culture and identification. Bacteriological culturing was performed according to standard procedures ( 56 , 57 ). In brief, 0.01 mL of milk was spread on cattle blood agar plates with esculin and incubated at 37°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%