2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2004.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of the generalised inverse of a random matrix and its applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the similar results as our Lemmas 2 and 3 have been independently proposed in [2,3]. The main difference is in that the derivations of [2,3] are based on exterior products, whereas ours based on the singular value decomposition. In addition, since Theorem 1 of [3] requires that the matrices involved are positive semidefinite, this theorem is a special case of Lemma 3.…”
Section: Lemmasupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We note that the similar results as our Lemmas 2 and 3 have been independently proposed in [2,3]. The main difference is in that the derivations of [2,3] are based on exterior products, whereas ours based on the singular value decomposition. In addition, since Theorem 1 of [3] requires that the matrices involved are positive semidefinite, this theorem is a special case of Lemma 3.…”
Section: Lemmasupporting
confidence: 75%
“…If X is symmetric and nonsingular, i.e., r=n, then J (Y → X) = |X| −(n+1) = |Y| n+1 [5, p.14]. We note that the similar results as our Lemmas 2 and 3 have been independently proposed in [2,3]. The main difference is in that the derivations of [2,3] are based on exterior products, whereas ours based on the singular value decomposition.…”
Section: Lemmamentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, few are the works published in the singular case, in fact, only after the papers of Uhlig [25] and Díaz-García et al [11], the articles on Jacobian computations of singular matrices began to be multiplied thanks to use of the forgotten technique of James [13]; see Díaz-García and Gutiérrez [8], Díaz-García and Gutiérrez-Jáimez [10], Díaz-García and González-Farías [6,7]. Another method applied to the singular case is explained in Srivastava [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, some related singular distributions have been proposed: the Wishart distribution, the matrix variate T, the matrix variate beta type I and II, among many others, see Díaz-García and González-Farías (2005a,b), , Díaz-García and Gutiérrez-Jáimez (2006), Díaz-García, Gutiérrez-Jáimez, and Mardia (1997), Ip, Wong, and Liu (2007) and Uhlig (1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%