2020
DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2020.1718622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of uterocervical angles in the second trimester of pregnant women at low risk for preterm delivery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the study of Llobet et al [ 27 ] with 275 singleton pregnant women showed that the mean UCA values increased from the first to the second trimester with statistical significance (84.2° versus 94.5°, p = 0.019). Sawaddisan et al [ 28 ] (Thailand, 2020) studied 372 singleton pregnant women at GAs from 16 + 0 to 23 + 6 weeks and showed that UCA values changed according to GA, but this change was not statistically significant (increase of 0.3° per week, p = 0.757).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the study of Llobet et al [ 27 ] with 275 singleton pregnant women showed that the mean UCA values increased from the first to the second trimester with statistical significance (84.2° versus 94.5°, p = 0.019). Sawaddisan et al [ 28 ] (Thailand, 2020) studied 372 singleton pregnant women at GAs from 16 + 0 to 23 + 6 weeks and showed that UCA values changed according to GA, but this change was not statistically significant (increase of 0.3° per week, p = 0.757).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ImageJ software was used by an attending ultrasound physician with more than 5 years of work experience to measure the UCA on the previously stored cervical image again, and repeated 3 times to obtain the average value. The angle between the lower segment of the uterus and the internal and external os of the cervix was considered the UCA ( Sawaddisan et al, 2020 ) ( Figure 2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One article was excluded because it specifically included pregnant women diagnosed with idiopathic polyhydramnios [23]. Of the eight articles remaining for a more thorough evaluation, one was excluded from the quantitative meta-analysis, as it hadan uninterpretable or incomplete data set [24], andanother one because it presented the data as median, not mean values [25]. Thus, six articles remained to be included in the meta-analysis [7,[26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Literature Search and Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all thestudies included, birth weeks were correlated with the UCA measurement performed at different time intervals at the beginning of the second trimester. Only Sawaddisan et al [24] evaluated the UCA prediction success according to the weeks in which UCA measurement was performed. In this study, while comparing UCA values with term and spontaneous preterm deliveries, the patients were divided into two groups: gestational age 16 0/7 -24 0/7 weeks (n = 356) and gestational age above 19.5 weeks (n = 141).…”
Section: Qualitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%