2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018gl078780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of Vapor and Condensate in a Hydrothermal System: Insights From Self‐Potential Inversion at Mount Tongariro, New Zealand

Abstract: Inversion of self‐potential data for source current density, js, in complex volcanic settings, yields hydrological information without the need for a prior groundwater flow model; js contains information about pH, pore saturation, and permeability, from which we infer the distribution of liquid and vapor phases. To understand the hydrothermal flow dynamics and hydraulic connectivity between surface thermal features at Mount Tongariro volcano, New Zealand, we undertook a reconnaissance scale self‐potential surv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aeromagnetic and hyperspectral data show that Mt Ruapehu currently has an active but spatially confined vent‐hosted hydrothermal system. This is in sharp contrast with the neighboring Tongariro volcanic complex, which has abundant hydrothermal features, including fumaroles and hot pools (Miller et al, 2018; Moore & Brock, 1981). While there is a limited surface hydrothermal alteration on Mt Ruapehu (i.e., intermediate and advanced argillic styles), covering 2.6 km 2 or only 5% of the total area (Figure 8), the location of this alteration is scattered throughout the mapped areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Aeromagnetic and hyperspectral data show that Mt Ruapehu currently has an active but spatially confined vent‐hosted hydrothermal system. This is in sharp contrast with the neighboring Tongariro volcanic complex, which has abundant hydrothermal features, including fumaroles and hot pools (Miller et al, 2018; Moore & Brock, 1981). While there is a limited surface hydrothermal alteration on Mt Ruapehu (i.e., intermediate and advanced argillic styles), covering 2.6 km 2 or only 5% of the total area (Figure 8), the location of this alteration is scattered throughout the mapped areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Tongariro is also dissected by many more faults on its east and west flanks compared to Ruapehu where active faults are nearly entirely absent (however, they may be buried by younger lava flows). These faults offset the basement by several hundred meters and may act as impermeable barriers (Miller et al, 2018) retaining circulating fluids within the hydrothermal system, promoting alteration. An eruptive hiatus between 80 and 50 ka (Conway et al, 2016), together with removal of hydrothermal alteration through deglaciation or flank collapse also contribute to the patchwork pattern at Ruapehu.…”
Section: Comparison With Mt Tongariro Alteration Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anomalous electrical signals have been observed during periods of volcanic unrest at several volcanoes (Hashimoto & Tanaka, 1995; Zlotnicki et al., 2001, 2005) and even appear prior to other geophysical signals (e.g., seismicity; Zlotnicki, 2015, and references therein). SP tomography and 3D time‐lapse inversion algorithms can accurately identify water flow patterns and SP source locations if the subsurface resistivity structure is known (e.g., Crespy et al., 2008; Jardani et al., 2008, 2007) with application to active volcanic systems (e.g., Vulcano [Revil et al., 2008] and Tongariro [Miller et al., 2018]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%