1995
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(95)00455-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of water molecules at Ag(111)/electrolyte interface as studied with surface X-ray scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

21
110
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
21
110
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3). Our results show that the pronounced water density layering at the mineral surface dissipates within about 9 Å (three times the diameter of a water molecule), in agreement with previous studies of water on flat solid surfaces [30,37,38,94,95]. The z coordinates of the first shoulder and first four peaks of the water density profile are reported in [44,53] of the first shoulder and first two peaks of the water density profile to water molecules that form hydrogen bonds with two (z* ≈ 1.8 Å), one (z* = 2.7 Å), or no surface O atoms (z* = 4.0 Å), respectively (Fig.…”
Section: Interfacial Water Structuresupporting
confidence: 92%
“…3). Our results show that the pronounced water density layering at the mineral surface dissipates within about 9 Å (three times the diameter of a water molecule), in agreement with previous studies of water on flat solid surfaces [30,37,38,94,95]. The z coordinates of the first shoulder and first four peaks of the water density profile are reported in [44,53] of the first shoulder and first two peaks of the water density profile to water molecules that form hydrogen bonds with two (z* ≈ 1.8 Å), one (z* = 2.7 Å), or no surface O atoms (z* = 4.0 Å), respectively (Fig.…”
Section: Interfacial Water Structuresupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As discussed in Hiemstra and van Riemsdijk (2006), the double layer structure that emerges can be explained by the alignment of water molecules near the surface in several layers, in which the electrolyte ions can only change stepwise their position. This picture agrees with experimental information obtained by different valuable approaches like force measurements (Pashley and Israelachvili, 1984;Israelachvili and Wennerstrom, 1996), X-ray reflectivity (Toney et al, 1995;Fenter and Sturchio, 2004;Catalano et al, 2006) and Sum Frequency Spectroscopy (Yeganeh et al, 1999;Kataoka et al, 2004;Ostroverkhov et al, 2005;Shen and Ostroverkhov, 2006). These measurements show increase in the ordering of water within a distance of about 0.7-0.9 nm, which is equivalent to about 2-3 layers of water molecules .…”
Section: Extended Stern Layer Modelsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…If we identify the location of the silica surface with the Gibbs surface of water obtained from  Ow (z,r) in Figure 3-2, the surfaces of the SiO 2 slab are located at z = 64.3  0.1 and 125.7  0.1 Å (pore length 61.4 Å) and simulated pore radii are r = 4.39 and 9.37 Å. Plots of  Ow and  Hw vs. distance d (measured from Gibbs surface of water O atoms towards the aqueous phase) show density layering up to about three statistical water monolayers (~ 9 Å) from the silica surface ( Figure 3-3), consistent with the behavior of water on a range of solid surfaces (Toney et al, 1995;Schlegel et al, 2002;Bourg and Sposito, 2011). Average water O and H density distributions on the flat external surfaces and concave pore walls of our simulated silica structures (Figure 3-3a, b) are essentially identical beyond the first statistical water monolayer (d > ~ 3 Å).…”
Section: Interfacial Water Structuresupporting
confidence: 64%