2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution, status, and conservation of radiated tortoises (Geochelone radiata) in Madagascar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in previous works, we found that detectability was affected by individuals’ age class: juveniles versus adults [29, 30, 41]. On the other hand, density was also affected by habitat patches and sites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…As in previous works, we found that detectability was affected by individuals’ age class: juveniles versus adults [29, 30, 41]. On the other hand, density was also affected by habitat patches and sites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Although there is a paucity of data on population size and trends, harvest pressure appears to constitute the main threat to this species. The radiated tortoise Astrochelys radiata is currently mainly threatened from a massive increase of collecting large-bodied individuals for bushmeat and, to a lesser degree, for the illegal export of small-bodied tortoises for the international pet trade [95], [100][101]. The same is true for the spider tortoise Pyxis arachnoides occurring in coastal areas of south-western and southern Madagascar where habitat loss is widespread and collection occurs for the overseas pet trade [103][104].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leuteritz et al (2005) compared distance sampling with the LincolnPetersen mark recapture technique (Greenwood, 1996) and concluded that the latter method was prone to overestimation when applied to the A. radiata population in south-west Madagascar. The half-normal model that we used is known to perform well with data that show a rapid fall in detection (Newey et al, 2003;Thomas et al, 2010), as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%