2018
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9817.12259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributional analyses of word frequency effects in Chinese sentence reading and lexical decision tasks

Abstract: Previous studies used the ex-Gaussian fitting technique to examine the distribution of word frequency effects in English sentence reading and lexical decision tasks. It was found that word frequency influences reaction times and eye fixation durations by both shifting the distribution to the right and increasing the skew for the lowfrequency target words. We used the same method to examine the distributional effects of word frequency through a Chinese sentence reading task in Experiment 1 and a lexical decisio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(75 reference statements)
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the holistic hypothesis supports the notion that the visual information system, character recognition system and word-recognition system affect the word-segmentation stage and word-recognition stage interactively. Previous studies supported the holistic assumption being suitable for Chinese reading, which is consistent with the results in this study ( Li et al, 2009 , 2011a ; Ma, 2017 ; Ma and Zhuang, 2018 ). Based on the holistic hypothesis, the inter-word spaces as low-level visual information affect reading comprehension from bottom to top, while the reading experience as a high-level cognition factor affects reading comprehension from top to bottom.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the holistic hypothesis supports the notion that the visual information system, character recognition system and word-recognition system affect the word-segmentation stage and word-recognition stage interactively. Previous studies supported the holistic assumption being suitable for Chinese reading, which is consistent with the results in this study ( Li et al, 2009 , 2011a ; Ma, 2017 ; Ma and Zhuang, 2018 ). Based on the holistic hypothesis, the inter-word spaces as low-level visual information affect reading comprehension from bottom to top, while the reading experience as a high-level cognition factor affects reading comprehension from top to bottom.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The primary task for readers of Chinese is to segment words from Chinese texts which do not contain inter-word spaces as an indicator of word segmentation. The characteristic of no inter-word spaces has been the subject of many studies focusing on the mechanism of word segmentation in Chinese reading ( Rayner, 1998 ; Bai et al, 2008 ; Bassetti, 2009 ; Li et al, 2009 , 2014 ; Cui et al, 2014 ; Zang et al, 2016 ; Ma, 2017 ; Liu and Lu, 2018 ; Ma and Zhuang, 2018 ; Zhou et al, 2020 ). Moreover, the reading direction is one of the significant characteristics among languages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RR was also higher from left to right than from right to left (b= 1.222, SE= 0.090, t= 13.537, p< 0.001). Compared with right to left and LF words, there were shorter fixation durations, higher SP, and lower refixation probability for left to right and HF words, which is consistent with expectations and previous research (Chen et al, 2021;Li et al, 2011;Liu et al, 2016;Ma, 2017;Ma & Zhuang, 2018;Rayner, Fischer & Pollatsek, 1998;Wang et al, 2018;).…”
Section: Experiments 1 Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results of Experiment 2 support the view that reading experience influences vocabulary recognition in Chinese reading. The word-frequency effect could reflect the vocabulary-recognition stage sensitively ( 19 ; 20 ; 21 ; 22 ; 32 ; 38 ). Notably, the interaction between format familiarity and word frequency was significant in the early indexes, which may indicate a delay in the word-frequency effect in right-to-left reading.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation