Distributional Patterns of Freshwater Decapoda (Crustacea: Malacostraca) in Southern South America: A Panbiogeographic Approach

Morrone, Juan J.; Lopretto, Estela Celia

doi:10.2307/2845607

Cited by 70 publications

(64 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The results for all crustacean species and for the grouping of Branchiopoda and Copepoda showed a gradual difference between Patagonian species and species located in northern regions, and are in agreement with the panbiogeographical analysis for centropagid copepods of Menu-Marque et al (2000), who found widespread species in combination with and of inland water decapods (Morrone & Lopretto, 1994). A similar zoogeographical pattern was observed in the genus Aegla (Perez-Lozada et al, 2002,2004,2009).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

“…In addition, in Chile, the Andes mountains represent a barrier that limits or prevents species dispersal between the two sides of the mountains and explains the marked differences in species reported from zones including Andean mountains (Morrone, 2006), compared to Southern Patagonia, where the mountains have practically disappeared and where it is possible to find many common species (Menu-Marque et al, 2000). Following this scenario, may help to explain the marked differences in species reported in western and eastern South America (Soto & Zúñiga, 1991;Morrone & Lopretto, 1994;Menu-Marque et al, 2000;Oyanedel et al, 2008).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Zoogeography of Chilean inland water crustaceans

Ríos-Escalante

Meruane

Morales

et al. 2013

lajar

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT. The Chilean inland water crustaceans are characterized by a combination of endemic and cosmopolitan species: some occur throughout the territory of continental Chile, while others are restricted to specific latitudinal regions. This study examined the zoogeographical patterns exhibited by Chilean inland water crustaceans. We considered six regions: Northern Chile (18º-27°S), North-Central Chile (27º-30°S), Central Chile (30º-38°S), Northern Patagonia (38°-41°S), Central Patagonia (41º-51°S), and Southern Patagonia (51º-55°S), and these were identified based on literature records of inland water crustaceans. The classification analysis generated dendrograms for the following groups considered in this categories: all inland water crustaceans (Branchiopoda, Copepoda and Malacostraca), the zooplanktonic crustaceans (Branchiopoda and Copepoda), the Malacostraca alone, and each group separately. Analysis of total data and of the zooplankton group taxa alone revealed the existence of a main grouping consisting of the three Patagonian zones plus Central Chile, that is distinct from that of Northern Chile and North-Central Chile. Similarly, analysis of the malacostracan data revealed the existence of two main groups, one comprising the three Patagonian zones plus Central Chile, contrasted with a second group of Northern and North-Central Chile combined. Our results are in agreement with other panbiogeographical studies of South American crustaceans and insects. Possible factors responsible for generating this pattern are the dispersal and colonization potential of zooplanktonic crustaceans and the marked endemism of the malacostracans.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 84%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Zoogeography of Chilean inland water crustaceans

Ríos-Escalante

Meruane

Morales

et al. 2013

lajar

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The interpretation of these generalized tracks is not straight forward; they may be interpreted either as dispersal routes, as done by, e.g. Morrone & Lopretto (1994), or as (indicative of) barriers, as Rosen did. Platnick & Nelson (1988) concluded that because relationships in panbiogeography are effectively resolved on the basis of present-day geographic proximity, its results may frequently be the artifacts of the method.…”

Section: Area Treesmentioning

confidence: 99%

An ontological dilemma: epistemology and methodology of historical biogeography

Andersson

1996

Journal of Biogeography

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The task of historical biogeography is to reveal and explain the history of biotas and their historical connections. Historical «relationship» between biotas is defined as the sharing of descendants of the same ancestor. Several generalized patterns of relationship, rather than a single universal one, should be expected for any set of biotas or areas. Such generalized patterns must be sought by comparison of individual patterns, based on individual monophyletic groups. Generalized patterns of biota relationships are formally statements about numerical universals, while a pattern derived from an individual group is a statement about a particular. Such statements are not subject to testing in the Popperian sense; they may be falsified as well as verified. As in other historical sciences, explanation in historical biogeography is genetic in form and probabilistic in nature. An explanation is falsified when an explanatory premise is, and corroborated when an explanatory premise is verified. Two major methodologies exist to derive «area cladograms» from substituted (taxon) cladograms, Component Analysis and Parsimony Analysis. It is argued that Parsimony Analysis is the theoretically more satisfactory of these because it treats all sources of «error» in the same way, making no process‐related assumptions about the sources of conflicts. The rooting of area dendrograms is problematic. The rooting by an «allzero» outarea is theoretically unsound and the dendrogram should be rooted a posteriori adjacent to the ancestral area(s), or not at all.

show abstract

“…Compatibilidad de trazos Análisis de parsimonia de endemismos Croizat (1958Croizat ( , 1964, Rosen (1976), Heads (1986Heads ( , 1989, Grehan (1988bGrehan ( , 2001a, Morrone (1993b, 1994a, 2000a, b, 2001a-f), Franco Rosselli & Berg (1997, Lopretto & Morrone (1998), Lourenço (1998), Contreras Medina et al (1999, Katinas et al (1999), Morrone & Pereira (1999) Page (1987) Craw (1988, 1989a), Morrone (1992), Morrone & Lopretto (1994), Posadas et al (1997) y Crisci et al (2001). Rosen (1988), Cracraft (1991), Myers (1991), Morrone (1994bMorrone ( , 1998, Fernandes et al (1995), Morrone & Lopretto (1995), Da Silva & Oren (1996, Morrone & Coscarón (1996), Posadas (1996), Bellan & Bellan Santini (1997), Cortés & Franco (1997), Morrone et al (1997, Posadas et al (1997), Geraads (1998), Linder & Mann (1998), Sfenthourakis & Giokas (1998), Watanabe (1998), …”

Section: Reconstrucción Manualmentioning

confidence: 99%

Panbiogeografía, componentes bióticos y zonas de transición

Morrone¹

2004

Rev. Bras. entomol.

Self Cite

185

132

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT. Recognition of biotic components is a key element for understanding evolution in space-time. Panbiogeography represents a biogeographic approach that may be applied to identify these biotic components. A revision of the panbiogeographic approach is provided herein, including definitions of basic concepts (individual and generalized tracks, nodes, baselines, and main massings) and methods (manual, connectivity and incidence matrices, track compatibility, and parsimony analysis of endemicity). As an example of this approach, 70 biotic components of Latin America and the Caribbean are identified, briefly characterized, and arranged in a biogeographic system of three regions, seven subregions, and two transition zones. The relevance of the recognition of biotic components and transition zones is discussed. KEYWORDS.Biogeography; evolution; Neotropics; nodes; parsimony analysis of endemicity; tracks. RESUMEN.El reconocimiento de componentes bióticos resulta clave para comprender la evolución en espacio-tiempo. La panbiogeografía representa un enfoque biogeográfico que puede aplicarse para identificar estos componentes bióticos. Se proprorciona una revisión del enfoque panbiogeográfico, incluyendo definiciones de conceptos básicos (trazos individuales y generalizados, nodos, líneas de base y centros de masa) y métodos (manual, matrices de conectividad e incidencia, compatibilidad de trazos y análisis de parsimonia de endemismos). Como un ejemplo de este enfoque, se identifican 70 componentes bióticos de América Latina y el Caribe, se caracterizan brevemente, y se ordenan en un sistema biogeográfico de tres regiones, siete subregiones y dos zonas de transición. Se discute la relevancia del reconocimiento de componentes bióticos y zonas de transición. KEYWORDS.Biogeografía; evolución; Neotrópicos; nodos; análisis de parsimonia de endemismos; trazos.La biogeografía estudia la distribución de los seres vivos en espacio y tiempo, al reconocer patrones de distribución, proponer hipótesis acerca de los procesos que los causaron y proporcionar un sistema de regionalización biótica del planeta. Esta disciplina es idiosincrásica, pues pese a la existencia de numerosos libros, simposios y cursos sobre la misma, raramente hay "biogeógrafos" (NELSON 1985), lo cual se debería a que ocupa un espacio intermedio entre la geografía, la geología y la biología, siendo practicada por sistemáticos, ecólogos, paleontólogos y geógrafos, entre otros. En la actualidad, la biogeografía atraviesa por un periodo extraordinario de renovación teórica y metodológica (MORRONE & CRISCI 1995;ANDERSSON 1996;VUILLEUMIER 1999;CRISCI 2001).Durante la historia de la biogeografía se han desarrollado varios enfoques diferentes, los que pueden clasificarse en dos grandes campos, denominados biogeografía ecológica y biogeografía histórica. La biogeografía ecológica generalmente analiza patrones de distribución individual o poblacional, a escalas espaciales y temporales pequeñas, mientras que la biogeografía histórica básicamente analiza patrones de di...

show abstract

Distributional Patterns of Freshwater Decapoda (Crustacea: Malacostraca) in Southern South America: A Panbiogeographic Approach

Cited by 70 publications

References 13 publications

Zoogeography of Chilean inland water crustaceans

Zoogeography of Chilean inland water crustaceans

An ontological dilemma: epistemology and methodology of historical biogeography

Panbiogeografía, componentes bióticos y zonas de transición

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About