Syntax and Semantics of Prepositions
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-3873-9_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributional Similarity and Preposition Semantics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One area of particular interest with this dataset will be the robustness of the method to function words (the particles), both under translation and in terms of calculating distributional similarity, although the findings of Baldwin (2006) for English prepositions are at least encouraging in this respect. Additionally, English VPCs can occur in "split" form (e.g.…”
Section: English Verb Particle Constructions (Evpc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One area of particular interest with this dataset will be the robustness of the method to function words (the particles), both under translation and in terms of calculating distributional similarity, although the findings of Baldwin (2006) for English prepositions are at least encouraging in this respect. Additionally, English VPCs can occur in "split" form (e.g.…”
Section: English Verb Particle Constructions (Evpc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alam (2003Alam ( , 2004 used decision trees to disambiguate 12 senses of over, distinguishing between senses which are determined by their governor and those which are determined by their NP complement. Baldwin (2006) explored the interaction between preposition valence and the distributional hypothesis, based on latent semantic analysis (LSA; Deerwester et al 1990). He derived gold-standard preposition-to-preposition similarities using each of Dorr's LCS lexicon (based on the method of Resnik and Diab [2000]) and Roget's Thesaurus, and compared them to the similarities predicted by LSA, in each case using either valence specification (considering intransitive and transitive prepositions separately) or valence underspecification (considering both preposition valences together).…”
Section: Automatic Classification Of Preposition Sensementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding prepositions, comparably little effort in computational semantics has gone beyond a specific choice of prepositions (such as spatial prepositions), towards a systematic classification of preposition senses, as in The Preposition Project (Litkowski and Hargraves, 2005). Distributional approaches towards preposition meaning and sense distinction have only recently started to explore salient preposition features, but with few exceptions (such as Baldwin (2006)) these approaches focused on token-based classification of preposition senses (Ye and Baldwin, 2006;O'Hara and Wiebe, 2009;Tratz and Hovy, 2009;Hovy et al, 2010;Hovy et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%