2019 IEEE Power &Amp; Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/pesgm40551.2019.8973569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributionally Robust Optimal DG Allocation Model Considering Flexible Adjustment of Demand Response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is mainly divided into two methods: probability density and distance information. DRO methods based on probability density mainly include three forms: multi-discrete scene (He et al, 2019), Wasserstein distance (Zhu et al, 2019) and KL divergence (Chen et al, 2018). DRO methods based on range information mainly include two forms: deterministic range (Chen et al, 2016) and indeterminate range (Alvarado et al, 2019;Lu et al, 2018a).…”
Section: ) Distribution Robust Optimization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is mainly divided into two methods: probability density and distance information. DRO methods based on probability density mainly include three forms: multi-discrete scene (He et al, 2019), Wasserstein distance (Zhu et al, 2019) and KL divergence (Chen et al, 2018). DRO methods based on range information mainly include two forms: deterministic range (Chen et al, 2016) and indeterminate range (Alvarado et al, 2019;Lu et al, 2018a).…”
Section: ) Distribution Robust Optimization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where: O p is the set that p s satisfies; N s represents the total number of scenes; A represents the configuration layer coefficient matrix; B represents the coefficient matrix of the operating layer; Ax in objective function Eq (25) represents the configuration cost "F C,1 "; By s represents the operating cost "F C,2 " in scenario s; Eq (26) represents the first stage variable related constraints, corresponding precisely to Eq (9); Eq (27) represents the second stage variable related constraints, corresponding to Eqs ( 16) to (24); Eq (28) represents the coupling constraint relationship between variables in the first and second stages, corresponding to Eqs (10) to (15); Eq (29) is the corresponding Eq (40) for the second-order cone relaxation constraint of the power flow.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithms, including analytical methods, numerical algorithms and so on, have been widely used in many real‐world problems and shown their inherent pros and cons. However, in the specific applications of DG planning, the features surely have different presentations, along with different problem‐specific techniques to enhance computation performance, which have been omitted in most existing studies; Some cutting‐edge methods have been ignored or have not been summarized in a systematic manner, for example, column and constraint generation algorithm, 43 dragonfly algorithm 44 and embedded meta evolutionary programming‐firefly algorithm‐ANN 45 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33][34][35][36] However, they heavily rely on an accurate model developed on a set of assumptions or simplifications, making the results not suitable in practice. By contrast, numerical algorithms such as linear programming (LP), 37 mixed non-linear programming (MINLP), [38][39][40][41][42] dynamic programming (DP) 43 reduce the reliance on accurate modelling which are easy to be implemented. However, this method may obtain inaccurate solution in complex systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation