2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2009.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributions related to events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(k − 1) + ν 1 (k)][10ν 1 (k − 1) + 13ν 1 (k)] 16a4 remains to apply (26) to complete the proof. Let M be a finite variation measure concentrated on integers andk |k||M {k}| < ∞.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(k − 1) + ν 1 (k)][10ν 1 (k − 1) + 13ν 1 (k)] 16a4 remains to apply (26) to complete the proof. Let M be a finite variation measure concentrated on integers andk |k||M {k}| < ∞.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Y is a Stein operator for sum of n independent rvs by matching mean with negative binomial rv. Now, for g ∈ G Z ∩ G Y , taking the expectation of U Y with respect to Y and using (10), we get required result.…”
Section: One-parameter Approximationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Taking the expectation w.r.t. T , we have Now, g ∈ G Z ∩ G T , taking supremum and using (10), we get required result.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…. In a recent paper, Dafnis et al (2010) studied distributions related to the (k 1 , k 2 ) events: at least (exactly, at most) k 1 consecutive 0's are followed by at least (exactly, at most) k 2 consecutive 1's. Presently, for k ≥ 1, we define the pattern E 0 : there are k consecutive successes and for k ≥ 2, we define the patterns E 1 : two successes are separated by at most k − 2 failures, E 2 : two successes are separated by exactly k − 2 failures, E 3 : two successes are separated by at least k − 2 failures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%