Distributive justice attitudes in Ukraine: Need, desert or social minimum?

Gatskova, Kseniia

doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2013.03.007

Cited by 18 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A further note is that in all three datasets, there were similar effects for the other dimensions, indicating consensus regarding expected rewards for inputs and abilities such as education, occupation, and age. These findings are in line with the results of earlier studies (e.g., Jasso and Rossi, 1977;Alves and Rossi, 1978;Jasso and Meyersson Milgrom, 2008;Gatskova, 2013).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Gender Bias in Justice Evaluations of Earnings: Evidence From Three Survey Experiments

Sauer

2020

Front. Sociol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Previous studies in sociological justice research have found mixed results on the gender bias in justice evaluations of earnings. Some studies report a just gender pay gap favoring men; others do not find this gap. This study investigates the gender bias in justice evaluations by linking it to the inequality structure in which people are embedded. The empirical analyses are based on three factorial survey studies that consist of fictitious full-time employees with varying characteristics, including gender. One study was conducted with social sciences students, and two used population samples of German inhabitants. The results show that social sciences students revealed no gender bias in their evaluations. In the population surveys, both men and women showed a rating behavior favoring male employees. Respondents living in federal states with high actual gender pay gaps produced a larger bias favoring men. The findings indicate that actual inequalities between men and women influence the gender bias in justice evaluations.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Gender Bias in Justice Evaluations of Earnings: Evidence From Three Survey Experiments

Sauer

2020

Front. Sociol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Both of these examples show that justice judgments also reflect respondents' personal interests and that experience with the resolution of distributional conflicts (or lack of it) plays a crucial role. This is supported by Buzea et al (2013) and Gatskova (2013). Buzea et al (2013) found significant differences between students and the rest of the population, with the former leaning more toward the equal-distribution principle.…”

Section: Experience-based Attitudes: Attitudes Toward Justice and Thementioning

confidence: 69%

“…The numbers of dimensions used per vignette range from three (Jann, 2008) to ten Gatskova, 2013;Sauer et al, 2009). The number of vignettes to be evaluated varies much more.…”

Section: Figure 1 Example Vignette With Five Dimensionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Using Factorial Surveys to Study Justice Perceptions: Five Methodological Problems of Attitudinal Justice Research

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

DFG Research Center (SFB) "From Heterogeneities to Inequalities"Whether fat or thin, male or female, young or old -people are different. Alongside their physical features, they also differ in terms of nationality and ethnicity; in their cultural preferences, lifestyles, attitudes, orientations, and philosophies; in their competencies, qualifications, and traits; and in their professions. But how do such heterogeneities lead to social inequalities? What are the social mechanisms that underlie this process? These are the questions pursued by the DFG Research Center (Sonderforschungsbereich (SFB)) "From Heterogeneities to Inequalities" at Bielefeld University, which was approved by the German Research Foundation (DFG) as "SFB 882" on May 25, 2011.In the social sciences, research on inequality is dispersed across different research fields such as education, the labor market, equality, migration, health, or gender. One goal of the SFB is to integrate these fields, searching for common mechanisms in the emergence of inequality that can be compiled into a typology. More than fifty senior and junior researchers and the Bielefeld University Library are involved in the SFB. Along with sociologists, it brings together scholars from the Bielefeld University faculties of Business Administration and Economics, Educational Science, Health Science, and Law, as well as from the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW) in Berlin and the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg. In addition to carrying out research, the SFB is concerned to nurture new academic talent, and therefore provides doctoral training in its own integrated Research Training Group. A data infrastructure project has also been launched to archive, prepare, and disseminate the data gathered. We assume that individuals evaluate inequalities in terms of whether they consider them just, and that they hold particular attitudes toward justice because, and as long as, these help them to attain their fundamental goals and to solve, especially, the problems that arise through cooperation with other people (cooperative relations). As a result, attitudes on justice are not viewed either as rigidly stable orientations across the life span or as "Sunday best beliefs" i.e. short-lived opinions that are adjusted continuously to fit situational interests. Instead, they are regarded as being shaped by the opportunities for learning and making comparisons in different phases of the life course and different social contexts. ResearchThe goal of the project is to use longitudinal survey data to explain why individuals have particular notions of justice. The key aspect is taken to be changes in the social contextparticularly households, social networks, or workplaces -in which individuals are embedded across their life course. This is because social contexts offer opportunities to make social comparisons and engage in social learning, processes that are decisive in the formation of particular attitudes to justice. The project will test this empirically by setting up a special longitud...

show abstract

“…It cannot be claimed that the entire population has totally rejected radical nationalist ideology (either ethnic Ukrainian nationalism or pro-Soviet/Russian leftism). But the dominant discourse in the society has turned towards ideals of social redistributive justice or neo-liberal economic policies for everyone (Gatskova, 2013).…”

Section: Russian Model In Ukraine: Economic Basis Government and Popmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ukraine between Russia and the European Union: Triangle Revisited

Samokhvalov¹

2015

Europe-Asia Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ukraine has long been considered as a bone of contention between the EU and Russia which could eventually lead to a split of the country along political, cultural or religious lines. This interpretation, however, fails to explain the dynamics of the Ukrainian revolution and the Russian-Ukrainian war. To address the deadlock in understanding the complex situation in Ukraine, this article argues that the relations in the triangle EU-Ukraine-Russia is affected by the combination of choices made by the Ukrainian political class, business elites and broader society in four major dimensions: internal political practices, economic international politics, and ideological dimension.

show abstract

Distributive justice attitudes in Ukraine: Need, desert or social minimum?

Cited by 18 publications

References 28 publications

Gender Bias in Justice Evaluations of Earnings: Evidence From Three Survey Experiments

Gender Bias in Justice Evaluations of Earnings: Evidence From Three Survey Experiments

Using Factorial Surveys to Study Justice Perceptions: Five Methodological Problems of Attitudinal Justice Research

Ukraine between Russia and the European Union: Triangle Revisited

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About