2019
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

diSTruct v1.0: generating biomolecular structures from distance constraints

Abstract: Summary The distance geometry problem is often encountered in molecular biology and the life sciences at large, as a host of experimental methods produce ambiguous and noisy distance data. In this note, we present diSTruct; an adaptation of the generic MaxEnt-Stress graph drawing algorithm to the domain of biological macromolecules. diSTruct is fast, provides reliable structural models even from incomplete or noisy distance data and integrates access to graph analysis tools. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CLUMPP 1.1 [ 23 ] was used to average ancestry coefficients of snail individuals across independent runs. Distruct 1.1 was used to visualize clusters inferred [ 24 ]. A principal coordinate analysis was performed with GeneAlex 6.5 to investigate the patterns of genetic relationships between snail individuals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CLUMPP 1.1 [ 23 ] was used to average ancestry coefficients of snail individuals across independent runs. Distruct 1.1 was used to visualize clusters inferred [ 24 ]. A principal coordinate analysis was performed with GeneAlex 6.5 to investigate the patterns of genetic relationships between snail individuals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With DIYABC analysis the posterior probability for each of the assumed 33 scenarios was calculated and presented in Supplementary Table S3. From the first round of the selection process, the five best scenarios (i.e., Scenario 5,12,24,29 and 33) were obtained, from which Scenario 24 with the highest posterior probability was selected after the second round. See Figure 5 and Table 6.…”
Section: Population Divergence Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results were submitted to the online software Structure Harvester v0.6.94 (Earl & vonHoldt, 2012 ) to determine the optimal K value by a Delta K method. Membership coefficient matrices (Q‐matrices) associated with the optimal K were processed using CLUMPP v1.12 (Jakobsson & Rosenberg, 2007 ), and then visualized using DISTRUCT v1.1 (Taubert et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The K-value with the highest K represents the number of potential genetic clusters in the population. Membership coefficient matrices (Q-matrices) associated with the optimal K were processed using CLUMPP v1.12 (Jakobsson and Rosenberg, 2007) and then visualized using the DISTRUCT v1.1 (Taubert et al, 2019). Finally, we used discriminant analysis of principal component (DAPC) to analyze population genetic structure under default settings to complement the STRUCTURE analysis.…”
Section: Phylogenetic and Population Genetic Structure Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%