2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2015.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disturbance analyses of forests and grasslands with MODIS and Landsat in New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On average, exotic forests are more disturbed than grasslands (18 months vs 3.8 months) [10], because the latter recover much faster. Connected disturbance increased significantly during the 2000-2004 period, where 65% of the forests in the Hoteo catchment were harvested.…”
Section: Nonlinear Changesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On average, exotic forests are more disturbed than grasslands (18 months vs 3.8 months) [10], because the latter recover much faster. Connected disturbance increased significantly during the 2000-2004 period, where 65% of the forests in the Hoteo catchment were harvested.…”
Section: Nonlinear Changesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In order to assess land disturbance (times and areas of bare ground), we used an 8 day, 450 meter land cover dataset developed by de Beurs et al (2016) [10]. Details of the methodology can be found in their paper, but briefly, for each Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) image, the Tasseled Cap transformation was calculated; by using the brightness, greenness, and wetness components based on the coefficients from Lobser and Cohen (2007) [43], a disturbance index (DI) ( Table 1) was calculated for every pixel.…”
Section: Land Cover/use and Disturbance Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1, Healey et al, 2005) was developed to capture forest disturbances, which are assumed to lead to an increase in brightness and a decrease in greenness and wetness. This index was modified for grasslands (de Beurs et al, 2016), where disturbances are assumed to lead to a decrease in all three Tasseled Cap components (Eq.2). Our study region is characterized by brighter soils in steppe areas (Beznosov and Uspanov, 1960), in contrast to the soils for which the grassland DI was developed.…”
Section: Measuring Grazing Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation 2 Equation 3Prior to calculating the DIs, we normalized all three tasseled cap components to account for the different value ranges of each component (Healey et al, 2005, de Beurs et al, 2016. As the reference for this normalization, we used locations identified as 'ungrazed steppe' in the field.…”
Section: Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%