2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disturbance and resilience of a granitic critical zone submitted to acid atmospheric influence (the Ringelbach catchment, Vosges Mountains, France): Lessons from a hydrogeochemical survey in the nineties

Abstract: The chemistry of precipitations and stream waters in the critical zone of a small granitic catchment mainly covered by grassland has been investigated backward (period 1990-1997). Major elements concentrations, fluxes and budgets at annual and seasonal scales allowed evaluating the catchment response to variation trends in atmospheric deposition and hydrological patterns. Acid precipitation was efficiently buffered by soil cations exchange and mineral weathering processes, as attested by the dominance of Ca an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, the rise in ion concentrations observed in stream water during autumn with the first stormflow events occurring after the strong summer evaporation period, is supposed to come from soil horizons and epikarst drainage. This "flushing effect" was evidenced by Walling and Foster [145] and later on by several authors on catchment draining various lithologies and under various climate conditions: on silicate basins such as the Mont-Lozère, the Strengbach and Ringelbach [72,111], the silicate-rich Chari-Logone River catchment in Chad [146], the Vantaa River boreal catchment in southern Finland [147], the Heidingzi agricultural catchment in China [137], and also on calcareous basins such as the Oka River forested catchment in Spain [148], the Middle Bussento Karst System in Italy [149], and the Chenqi agricultural karstic catchment [150].…”
Section: Respective Control Of Karst and Epikarst On Stream Water Chementioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lastly, the rise in ion concentrations observed in stream water during autumn with the first stormflow events occurring after the strong summer evaporation period, is supposed to come from soil horizons and epikarst drainage. This "flushing effect" was evidenced by Walling and Foster [145] and later on by several authors on catchment draining various lithologies and under various climate conditions: on silicate basins such as the Mont-Lozère, the Strengbach and Ringelbach [72,111], the silicate-rich Chari-Logone River catchment in Chad [146], the Vantaa River boreal catchment in southern Finland [147], the Heidingzi agricultural catchment in China [137], and also on calcareous basins such as the Oka River forested catchment in Spain [148], the Middle Bussento Karst System in Italy [149], and the Chenqi agricultural karstic catchment [150].…”
Section: Respective Control Of Karst and Epikarst On Stream Water Chementioning
confidence: 84%
“…Consequently, strong acid inputs also result in a decrease of the stream water alkalinity, mainly composed by HCO 3 − [72,111]. This acidification process due to strong acids can be estimated by the decrease of alkalinity.…”
Section: Alkalinity Decrease (∆ Alk )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5). Following these conditions, the first storm event loaded and carried elements accumulated in soils by concentration (elements from mineral weathering or dissolution such as Ca, Mg, Na and/or from fertiliser input, K, Cl, SO 4 ,NO 3 ) and adsorption/desorption processes, particularly obvious for sulphate as described in many catchments (Piñol et al, 1992;Probst et al, 1990;Probst and Ambroise, 2019). This high concentration was described as "the washout effect" (Piñol et al, 1992)or a"flush" effect (Reynolds and Edwards, 1995).…”
Section: Geochemical Physical and Biological Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the anthropogenic perturbations, acid rain and more generally atmospheric acid deposition have impacted, sometimes deeply, the biogeochemical cycles of several elements (C, N, S, P, Al, H and other nutrients such as Ca and Mg; Paces, 1985;Cosby et al, 1985;Martin and Harr 1988;Landman and Bonneau (eds) 1995;Norton et al, 2000;De Vries et al, 2003;Hruska and Kram, 2003;Oulehle et al, 2006;Vanguelova et al, 2010;Norton et al, 2014;McHale et al, 2017;Oulehle et al, 2017;Probst and Ambroise, 2018). The acidification of surface waters and soils degraded the quality of stream and spring waters, lakes and soils, notably by increasing the release of base cations and metals, leading to nutrient imbalances and causing forest decline, fish death, eutrophication of lakes and corrosion of monuments and water pipes (Likens and Bormann, 1974;Charlson and Rodhe, 1982;Schulze, 1989;Probst et al, 1990aProbst et al, ,b, 1995aLikens et al, 1996;Dambrine et al, 1998a;Evans et al, 2001;Jenkins et al, 2003;Watmough and Dillon, 2003;Moldan et al, 2004;Zhang et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%