2016 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/aim.2016.7577011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disturbance compensation for iterative control of suspension durability test rigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 2, a McPherson suspension is mounted on the fixture and the hydraulic test rig is controlled by the PID controller [21]. In practice, the PID controller is usual in the vehicle durability testing [6], [14]. Due to the frequent replacement of specimen in the durability testing, the PID controller is more suitable and easy to tune.…”
Section: Experimental Multi-axial Suspension Test Rigmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Figure 2, a McPherson suspension is mounted on the fixture and the hydraulic test rig is controlled by the PID controller [21]. In practice, the PID controller is usual in the vehicle durability testing [6], [14]. Due to the frequent replacement of specimen in the durability testing, the PID controller is more suitable and easy to tune.…”
Section: Experimental Multi-axial Suspension Test Rigmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the physical system model G cannot be acquired exactly so the experimentally identified FRF matrix G can substitute for it. Based on Equation 9, the drive can be updated (14) It is obvious that the classical offline ILC method is a particular example of optimization problem.…”
Section: The Offline Ilc Strategy With Quasi-newton Optimization mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11 Moten et al 12 make use of adaptive inverse plant modeling technique to identify the system where the length of finite impulse response filters must be sufficient. Muller et al [13][14][15] identify directly the time domain inverse model of multiaxial test rig without inverting the model like traditional method and the structure of model is optimized based on the correlation of the outputs leading to more control stability. Although parametric time model can achieve comparable accuracy with shorter measurement data, an order has to be selected for each part of the multivariable model which is onerous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%