2011
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2010.0517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disturbance observer-based control of non-linear haptic teleoperation systems

Abstract: Teleoperation systems are subject to different types of disturbances. Such disturbances, when unaccounted for, may cause poor performance and even instability of the teleoperation system. This paper presents a novel nonlinear bilateral control scheme using the concept of disturbance observer based control for nonlinear teleoperation systems. Lumping the effects of dynamic uncertainties and external disturbances into a single disturbance term enables us to design a disturbance observer in order to suppress thes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The previous theorem addresses the case when we have slow-varying disturbances. In tha case of fast-varying disturbances, the tracking errors will be globally uniformly ultimately bounded [12]. The next theorem states that the disturbance tracking and the position tracking errors of the teleoperation system can converge exponentially to zero under certain conditions.…”
Section: Proposed Disturbance Observersmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The previous theorem addresses the case when we have slow-varying disturbances. In tha case of fast-varying disturbances, the tracking errors will be globally uniformly ultimately bounded [12]. The next theorem states that the disturbance tracking and the position tracking errors of the teleoperation system can converge exponentially to zero under certain conditions.…”
Section: Proposed Disturbance Observersmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Then the disturbance observer based control laws given in (4) and (5) with choices in (8), (9) and (10) (20) and (21). Proof: Proof can be found in [12]. The previous theorem addresses the case when we have slow-varying disturbances.…”
Section: Proposed Disturbance Observersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time-delayed position/force signals are then added to the output of the disturbance observer in order to provide the master and the slave robots with estimation of the undelayed versions of the position/force signals and thus improve the teleoperation system transparency (Natori et al, 2010). In (Mohammadi et al, 2011b), the authors implemented a pair of nonlinear disturbance observers in a 4-channel bilateral teleoperation architecture to achieve full transparency in the absence of communication time delays in both free and constrained motions. In that work, however, the availability of joint acceleration measurements, which is necessary for achieving full transparency, simplified design of disturbance observers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [9], a disturbance observer was used at the slave side of a nonlinear unilateral teleoperation system in order to improve the position tracking between the master and the slave while the slave robot was moving in free space. In [10], the authors implemented a pair of nonlinear disturbance observers in a 4-channel bilateral teleoperation architecture to achieve full transparency in the absence of communication time delays in both free and constrained motions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%