2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/9866794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disturbance Observer-Smith Predictor Compensation-Based Platoon Control with Estimation Deviation

Abstract: In the research of cooperative adaptive cruise control, the coupling relationship between the communication delay, the following time headway, and the string stability leads to a stringent limit on the minimum allowable following time headway. To deal with this limitation, this paper proposes the Disturbance Observer-Smith Predictor Compensation (DOB-SPC)-based Master-Slave architecture. The SPC is adopted to move the communication delays and actuator delays outside the feedback loop in the Master-Slave archit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It allows for flexible adaptation to system variations and faults, improving control effectiveness (as shown in tracking issues of the joint angles and contact forces under disturbances using the previously designed LADRC-SMC. There are various approaches to address this issue, and we choose a simple and classical solution, SP [34,35], which forms a multi-loop control strategy (see Figure 4). This strategy decomposes the single-leg control system of a robot into multiple independent control loops, each of which is responsible for controlling specific variables or subsystems within the system.…”
Section: Fourth-order Ladrc-smc Comparison Group With or Without Sp Loopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It allows for flexible adaptation to system variations and faults, improving control effectiveness (as shown in tracking issues of the joint angles and contact forces under disturbances using the previously designed LADRC-SMC. There are various approaches to address this issue, and we choose a simple and classical solution, SP [34,35], which forms a multi-loop control strategy (see Figure 4). This strategy decomposes the single-leg control system of a robot into multiple independent control loops, each of which is responsible for controlling specific variables or subsystems within the system.…”
Section: Fourth-order Ladrc-smc Comparison Group With or Without Sp Loopmentioning
confidence: 99%