2019
DOI: 10.1002/eap.2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disturbance regulates the density–body‐mass relationship of soil fauna

Abstract: Theory on the density–body‐mass (DBM) relationship predicts that the density of animal species decreases by the power of −0.75 per unit increase in their body mass, or by the power of −1 when taxa across trophic levels are studied. This relationship is, however, largely debated, as the slope often deviates from the theoretical predictions. Here, we tested the ability of the DBM relationship to reflect changes in the structure of communities subjected to an anthropogenic disturbance. The slope would become less… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, we obtain that the equilibrium abundance R * is bounded below and above by body mass-dependent amounts (Damuth, 2001). It should be added that several studies have shown that densities of some species are not proportional to body size in −3/4 and even positive relationships between density and body size have been observed (Russo et al, 2003;Maxwell and Jennings, 2006;van Langevelde et al, 2020). Moreover, these relationships can be generated in a non-linear and polygonal fashion (Leaper and Raffaelli, 1999;Andrew and Hughes, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…As a result, we obtain that the equilibrium abundance R * is bounded below and above by body mass-dependent amounts (Damuth, 2001). It should be added that several studies have shown that densities of some species are not proportional to body size in −3/4 and even positive relationships between density and body size have been observed (Russo et al, 2003;Maxwell and Jennings, 2006;van Langevelde et al, 2020). Moreover, these relationships can be generated in a non-linear and polygonal fashion (Leaper and Raffaelli, 1999;Andrew and Hughes, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Non-target and beneficial insects are known to be negatively affected by PPP, with for example the effects of neonicotinoid insecticides receiving much attention in the last decade [ 21 ]. As insects are susceptible to PPP, insects are considered indicator species to quantify differences in the use of PPP between fields [ 22 , 23 ]. In this study we will collect ground-dwelling and flying insects, in three 21-day cycles (for flying insects the cycles may be slightly longer depending on weather conditions) to assess biodiversity.…”
Section: Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%