2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00410-012-0847-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disturbance versus preservation of U–Th–Pb ages in monazite during fluid–rock interaction: textural, chemical and isotopic in situ study in microgranites (Velay Dome, France)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
48
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
9
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…274 ± 7 Ma for a Quatre-Vios granite, Caen-Vachette et al 1982) are now believed to reflect late isotopic disturbance: the Montasset granite ( Fig. 1) yielded pristine monazites with a LA-ICP-MS age of 307 ± 2 Ma, and fluid-altered monazites with scattered ages suggesting reopening of the isotopic system between 270 and 290 Ma (Didier et al 2013). …”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…274 ± 7 Ma for a Quatre-Vios granite, Caen-Vachette et al 1982) are now believed to reflect late isotopic disturbance: the Montasset granite ( Fig. 1) yielded pristine monazites with a LA-ICP-MS age of 307 ± 2 Ma, and fluid-altered monazites with scattered ages suggesting reopening of the isotopic system between 270 and 290 Ma (Didier et al 2013). …”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The alignment of the instrument and mass calibration were performed before every analytical session using the NIST SRM 612 reference glass by inspecting the 238 U signal and by minimizing the ThOþ/Thþ ratio (,1%). The analytical method for isotope dating is similar to that developed and described in Paquette & Tiepolo (2007) and Didier et al (2013) and detailed in Hurai et al (2010) A single analysis consisted of 30 s of background integration with the laser off, followed by 60 s integration with the laser firing, and a 20 s delay to wash out the previous sample and prepare for the next analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bastnäsite is not a secondary mineral formed via alteration or replacement of a pre-existing REE mineral, but rather a primary LREE phase. Such a scenario does not discount the possibility of a precursor LREE mineral phase, such as monazite, that has since been altered or dissolved, with LREE "recycled" into synchysite (e.g., [56]) or bastnäsite. There is, however, no direct evidence of synchysite or bastnäsite replacing monazite or any other LREE-bearing mineral, apart from bastnäsite replacing synchysite.…”
Section: Formation Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%