Ditching 'Diglossia': Describing Ecologies of the Spoken and Inscribed in Pre-modern Korea

King, Ross

doi:10.21866/esjeas.2015.15.1.001

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2018

2023

Publication Types

Select...

Book2

Other2

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent6

Authors

Journals

Cited by 16 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A more literal rendition would be "Ruist characters." 6 SeeKing (2015) for a defense of the term "Sinographic Cosmopolis" as well as further discussion of related terminological issues King and Laffin (2020). also discuss these questions with reference to additional recent scholarship not cited here.Bunkyō Kin -9789004437302 Downloaded from Brill.com04/10/2023 08:49:02AM via free access…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Preliminary Material

Kin¹,

King²,

Burge³

et al. 2021

Literary Sinitic and East Asia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Preliminary Material

Kin¹,

King²,

Burge³

et al. 2021

Literary Sinitic and East Asia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Korean Language, Power, and National Identity

Kim-Renaud

2022

The Two Koreas and Their Global Engagements

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Early Tang China and the World, 618–750 CE

Yang

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For about half a century, the Tang dynasty has held a reputation as the most 'cosmopolitan' period in Chinese history, marked by unsurpassed openness to foreign peoples and cultures and active promotion of international trade. Heavily influenced by Western liberal ideals and contemporary China's own self-fashioning efforts, this glamorous image of the Tang calls for some critical reexamination. This Element presents a broad and revisionist analysis of early Tang China's relations with the rest of the Eurasian world and argues that idealizing the Tang as exceptionally “cosmopolitan” limits our ability to think both critically and globally about its actions and policies as an empire.

show abstract

Ditching 'Diglossia': Describing Ecologies of the Spoken and Inscribed in Pre-modern Korea

Cited by 16 publications

References 12 publications

Preliminary Material

Preliminary Material

Korean Language, Power, and National Identity

Early Tang China and the World, 618–750 CE

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About