A comparison between solute travel times predicted by a transient and a steady state flow model is made. Data for five different soil profiles with detailed measurements of their hydraulic properties and their variation with depth are used. Daily measurements of meteorological data are used as input parameters in the transient simulations that include snow and frost dynamics, interception of precipitation, and evapotranspiration. The parameters of the steady state flow model are related to the measured soil properties and the hydrological characteristics of each transient simulation. Furthermore, the influence of solute injection time on the predicted travel time is analyzed, and the effect of root water uptake on the applicability of the steady state flow assumption for solute advection is investigated. The results indicate that the steady state flow model may provide estimates of the mean solute advection that are compatible with those of the transient flow model. The constant rate of recharge in the steady state flow model should then be interpreted as the average annual effective infiltration (i.e., infiltration minus actual evapotranspiration). When root water uptake is accounted for, an arithmetic depth-averaging of the soil parameters appears to yield steady state estimates of arrival time that are closest to the transient predictions. When root water uptake is neglected, a harmonic depth-averaging of the soil parameters provides the best steady state results. The discrepancy between the arrival times predicted with the two flow models decreases with the travel distance from the soil surface.
INTRODUCTIONSolute transport in field soils under natural weather conditions is generally a complex process. Any transport model, however detailed and sophisticated mathematically and numerically, is still a simplification of reality. In addition, a correct estimation of the required input parameters under field conditions is often a major problem so that simple models with fewer system parameters may in some cases be t•eferable to more intricate ones. Numerical solutions of transient flow in the unsaturated zone, and of the transport equation with time-dependent advection term, are complex and require excessive input information of both weather and soil properties. Furthermore, spatial heterogeneity in natural fields often further .complicates the solution and increases the need for input information. Thus, although water flow close to the soil .•urface is in general highly transient, many investigators of solute transport in the unsaturated zone have used the s.implifying assumption of steady state flow [e.g., van Gen-•chten and Wierenga, 1976; Bresler and Dagan, 1981; Jl•ry, t982: Small and Mular, 1987; van der Zee and van Riemsd-4/L 1987; Butters and JIo'y, 1989; Destouni and Cvetkovic, 1991]. In addition, experimental studies of transport processes in soils are often conducted under steady state flow coMitions [e.g., Gaudet et al., 1977; Nkedi-Kizza et al., 1983; Jur3' et al., 1986; Wierenga and van Genuchten, 19...