Ganio MS, Brothers RM, Lucas RAI, Hastings JL, Crandall CG. Validity of auscultatory and Penaz blood pressure measurements during profound heat stress alone and with an orthostatic challenge. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 301: R1510 -R1516, 2011. First published August 10, 2011 doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00247.2011.-Despite frequent reporting of blood pressure (BP) during profound passive heat stress, both with and without a hypotensive challenge, the method by which BP is measured often varies between laboratories. It is unknown whether auscultatory and finger BP measures accurately reflect intra-arterial BP during dynamic changes in cardiac output and peripheral resistance associated with the aforementioned conditions. The purpose of this investigation was to test the hypothesis that auscultatory BP measured at the brachial artery, and finger BP measured by the Penaz method, are valid measures of intra-arterial BP during a passive heat stress and a heat-stressed orthostatic challenge, via lower body negative pressure (LBNP). Absolute (specific aim 1) and the change in (specific aim 2) systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and mean BPs (MBP) were compared at normothermia, after a core temperature increase of 1.47 Ϯ 0.09°C, and during subsequent LBNP. Heat stress did not change auscultatory SBP (6 Ϯ 11 mmHg; P ϭ 0.16), but Penaz SBP (Ϫ22 Ϯ 16 mmHg; P Ͻ 0.001) and intra-arterial SBP (Ϫ11 Ϯ 13 mmHg P ϭ 0.017) decreased. In contrast, DBP and MBP did not differ between methods throughout heat stress. Compared with BP before LBNP, the magnitude of the reduction in BP with all three methods was similar throughout LBNP (P Ͼ 0.05). In conclusion, auscultatory SBP and Penaz SBP failed to track the decrease in intra-arterial SBP that occurred during the profound heat stress, while decreases in arterial BP during an orthostatic challenge are comparable between methodologies. lower body negative pressure; passive heat stress; arterial blood pressure VARIOUS METHODS ARE USED TO measure arterial blood pressure (BP) in the passively heat-stressed human (6,8,18,20,31,35,36). The most valid approach is an intra-arterial catheter connected to a calibrated transducer (BP INTRA ). Although BP INTRA is the gold standard, physician assistance and supervision are often required, and there is significant cost and subject risk, resulting in BP INTRA measurements being prohibitive in most settings.An alternative to BP INTRA is automated auscultatory BP (BP AUSC ). This method is often used because of the relatively low cost, ease of use, and its capacity to be used in a variety of settings (26). However, this method is limited because each measurement requires ϳ30 s, thus prohibiting the use of BP AUSC during conditions when arterial BP is rapidly changing (e.g., when a subject is approaching presyncope during an orthostatic tolerance test).In the 1970's, noninvasive beat-by-beat BP measurements were made possible using a finger cuff coupled with Penaz technology (25). Penaz-derived BP (BP PENAZ ) recordings have been validated for resting...