2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2009.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diurnal variation of surface currents at a tropical station

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These ions attach to aerosol particles and lead to reduction in progeny concentration near the surface by the onset of convection after sunrise (Raghavayya, 1998;Nagaraja et al, 2003b). Measurements of air conductivity and space charge at this place by Pawar and Kamra (2000) and Kulkarni et al (2010) also show high values during night compared to day. They have attributed such high value of space charge density and conductivity to the increased radioactive gas concentration near the Earth surface due to stable atmosphere during that time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ions attach to aerosol particles and lead to reduction in progeny concentration near the surface by the onset of convection after sunrise (Raghavayya, 1998;Nagaraja et al, 2003b). Measurements of air conductivity and space charge at this place by Pawar and Kamra (2000) and Kulkarni et al (2010) also show high values during night compared to day. They have attributed such high value of space charge density and conductivity to the increased radioactive gas concentration near the Earth surface due to stable atmosphere during that time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this behavior is not consistent with our observations. Space charge generation near the ground is also enhanced during nighttime conditions as a result of several physical mechanisms [ Dhanorkar and Kamra , ; Kulkarni et al ., ; Anisimov et al ., ]. The latter explanation is also contradictory to our results, since the presence of additional charge in the vicinity of the CG leader near the ground is expected to inhibit the electric field strength, ultimately leading to weaker −CG peak currents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%